13.1 sec in total
2.1 sec
10 sec
968 ms
Click here to check amazing REMONT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about remont.pro
Ремонт бытовой техники с выездом в городах Екатеринбург, Верхняя Пышма и Березовский. Цены от 300р. Гарантия. Опыт | REMONT.PRO
Visit remont.proWe analyzed Remont.pro page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
remont.pro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value540 ms
54/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
2064 ms
1337 ms
166 ms
282 ms
758 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Remont.pro, 94% (85 requests) were made to Z255544.infobox.ru and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) relates to the external source Z255544.infobox.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 220.2 kB (9%)
2.6 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Remont.pro main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. REMONT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 90.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remont.pro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (14%)
87
75
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of REMONT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
remont.pro
2064 ms
screen.css.php
1337 ms
jquery.min.js
166 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
282 ms
slideshow.css
758 ms
jquery.cycle.js
747 ms
jquery.reveal.js
755 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
754 ms
quots.js
750 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
954 ms
jquery.validate.pack.js
1135 ms
jquery.contactable.js
943 ms
contactable.css
943 ms
2_0_20FF20FF_00FF00FF_0_pageviews
300 ms
common.js.php
991 ms
jquery.noty.css
1145 ms
logomidle.jpg
1491 ms
button_kuxni-165x70.jpg
1142 ms
button_lepninapoleuritan-165x70.jpg
1221 ms
button_konsoli-165x70.jpg
1407 ms
button_moldingi-165x70.jpg
1410 ms
button_ornamenty-165x70.jpg
1404 ms
button_potoloch_ornamenty-165x70.jpg
1408 ms
button_potoloch_gladk-165x70.jpg
1404 ms
button_uglov_dekor-165x70.jpg
1514 ms
button_dekorbalki-165x70.jpg
1524 ms
button_dypolimer-165x70.jpg
1513 ms
button_baget_kol-165x70.jpg
1517 ms
button_baget-165x70.jpg
1559 ms
button_kart_baget-165x70.jpg
1645 ms
button_kog_plitka-165x70.jpg
1660 ms
button_klei-165x70.jpg
1660 ms
button_freski-165x70.jpg
1663 ms
lepnina-4-780x350.jpg
2187 ms
freska-4-780x350.jpg
2208 ms
baget-4-780x350.jpg
2145 ms
svetodiod-3-780x350.jpg
2187 ms
plitka-3-780x350.jpg
2328 ms
lepnina-3-780x350.jpg
2177 ms
freska-3-780x350.jpg
2428 ms
baget-3-780x350.jpg
1874 ms
svetodiod-2-780x350.jpg
1902 ms
lepnina-2-780x350.jpg
1731 ms
plitka-2-780x350.jpg
1770 ms
freska-2-780x350.jpg
2051 ms
svetodiod-1-780x350.jpg
1798 ms
baget-2-780x350.jpg
1849 ms
intro-6-780x350.jpg
1919 ms
intro-5-780x350.jpg
2025 ms
intro-2_2-780x350.jpg
2198 ms
intro-4-780x350.jpg
1989 ms
intro-2_3-780x350.jpg
4417 ms
intro-2_1-780x350.jpg
3029 ms
intro-6_1-780x350.jpg
4711 ms
watch.js
2 ms
BabelSans.woff
1935 ms
intro-3_1-780x350.jpg
2022 ms
intro-3-780x350.jpg
3880 ms
intro-2-780x350.jpg
2297 ms
freska-1-780x350.jpg
2343 ms
plitka-1-780x350.jpg
2562 ms
intro-3_2-780x350.jpg
2616 ms
baget-1-780x350.jpg
3209 ms
lepnina-1-780x350.jpg
3782 ms
plitka-4-780x350.jpg
3793 ms
sveetodiod-4-780x350.jpg
3741 ms
baget-5-780x350.jpg
4568 ms
freska-5-780x350.jpg
4522 ms
lepnina-5-780x350.jpg
3948 ms
plitka-5-780x350.jpg
3934 ms
baget-6-780x350.jpg
4379 ms
freska-6-780x350.jpg
3870 ms
lepnina-6-780x350.jpg
3864 ms
freska-7-780x350.jpg
5007 ms
designpodarok-780x350.jpg
4118 ms
baner-1-800x300.jpg
4010 ms
baner-3-800x300.jpg
4217 ms
baner-2-800x300.jpg
4580 ms
baner-4-800x300.jpg
4346 ms
blizko-165x70.jpg
3885 ms
bullet_1.png
4033 ms
sprite.png
4165 ms
price_0.png
4100 ms
box_border_8.png
4095 ms
shop_info_icons.png
4182 ms
up.png
4951 ms
feebackRu.png
3944 ms
ajax-loader.gif
3757 ms
arrows.png
3851 ms
bullets.png
3778 ms
remont.pro accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
remont.pro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
remont.pro SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remont.pro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remont.pro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
remont.pro
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of REMONT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: