8.3 sec in total
487 ms
7.4 sec
405 ms
Welcome to remotestaff.ph homepage info - get ready to check Remote Staff best content for Philippines right away, or after learning these important things about remotestaff.ph
Not your typical home-based job board. We provide work from home jobs for skilled Filipinos backed by our commitment to empowering relationships.
Visit remotestaff.phWe analyzed Remotestaff.ph page load time and found that the first response time was 487 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
remotestaff.ph performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
3/100
10%
Value20.6 s
0/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value7,690 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value31.8 s
0/100
10%
487 ms
1150 ms
289 ms
86 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Remotestaff.ph, 6% (6 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Remotestaff.ph.
Page size can be reduced by 209.2 kB (10%)
2.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Remotestaff.ph main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 144.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remote Staff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 39.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remotestaff.ph has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (73%)
94
25
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote Staff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
remotestaff.ph
487 ms
www.remotestaff.ph
1150 ms
hf.js
289 ms
gtm.js
86 ms
js
152 ms
fbevents.js
44 ms
extendify-utilities.css
238 ms
rs-frontend.css
463 ms
frontend.min.css
881 ms
flatpickr.min.css
677 ms
select2.min.css
687 ms
style.css
693 ms
bootstrap.min.css
71 ms
style.css
700 ms
js_composer.min.css
1190 ms
shortcodes.css
1131 ms
responsive.css
915 ms
a3_lazy_load.min.css
920 ms
timed-content.css
932 ms
jquery.min.js
1320 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1144 ms
flatpickr.min.js
1147 ms
select2.min.js
1398 ms
sweetalert2.all.min.js
1359 ms
timed-content.js
1372 ms
css
106 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
1372 ms
owl.theme.default.css
1457 ms
owl.carousel.js
1570 ms
owl.navigation.js
1581 ms
sdk.js
70 ms
dashicons.min.css
2173 ms
thickbox.css
1650 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
1698 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
2173 ms
frontend.min.js
2171 ms
api.js
104 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
2211 ms
waypoints.min.js
2173 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
2170 ms
prettyPhoto.js
2429 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
2429 ms
functions.js
2428 ms
flexslider.min.js
2429 ms
js.cookie.min.js
68 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2428 ms
js
54 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
destination
103 ms
8595.js
412 ms
js
89 ms
collect
48 ms
collect
67 ms
thickbox.js
2157 ms
js
44 ms
ga-audiences
22 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2236 ms
www.remotestaff.ph.json
43 ms
84a07e3a698688683d493761c9786bde.js
11 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2019 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
2009 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
2001 ms
XAc9PGdpBw8
240 ms
9th-fold-image.jpg
1013 ms
logo-footer.png
1268 ms
rs-logo.png
1274 ms
mobilehome.jpg
1963 ms
white-fade-2.png
1443 ms
Common-Career-Mistakes-Remote-Workers-Make-and-How-to-Avoid-Them.jpg
1960 ms
4-Risks-of-Faking-It-Till-You-Make-it-In-Remote-Work.jpg
1961 ms
I-Cant-Find-a-Job-That-Lets-Me-Work-Online-What-Should-I-Do.jpg
1961 ms
feature-6-Things-to-Do-With-Your-First-WFH-Salary.jpg
2148 ms
fb-icon.png
1645 ms
twitter-icon.png
1961 ms
insta-icon.png
2076 ms
linkedin-icon.png
2077 ms
youtube-1.png
2077 ms
close.png
2147 ms
referral-program.png
2115 ms
futura_light_bt-webfont.woff
2196 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf
153 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf
207 ms
futura_medium_bt-webfont.woff
2152 ms
L9LPsuILosM
154 ms
www-player.css
31 ms
www-embed-player.js
51 ms
base.js
130 ms
great_studio_-_bostonangelbold-bold-webfont.woff
2074 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2143 ms
sdk.js
6 ms
535 ms
ad_status.js
381 ms
Hg8RJ6IYDEt2XfeS9TTatHSj5NgA1bkUUg8jx44YVvw.js
136 ms
embed.js
84 ms
id
50 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
53 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
55 ms
Create
238 ms
Create
325 ms
GenerateIT
19 ms
GenerateIT
29 ms
recaptcha__en.js
91 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
287 ms
widget.js
26 ms
remotestaff.ph accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
remotestaff.ph best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
remotestaff.ph SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remotestaff.ph can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remotestaff.ph main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
remotestaff.ph
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Remote Staff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: