Tools & Wizards About Us
remotestaff.ph screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

remotestaff.ph

Lifetime Remote Careers for Filipinos | Remote Staff

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

503 ms

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

502 ms

remotestaff.ph screenshot

About Website

Welcome to remotestaff.ph homepage info - get ready to check Remote Staff best content for Philippines right away, or after learning these important things about remotestaff.ph

Not your typical home-based job board. We provide work from home jobs for skilled Filipinos backed by our commitment to empowering relationships.

Visit remotestaff.ph

Key Findings

We analyzed Remotestaff.ph page load time and found that the first response time was 503 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

remotestaff.ph performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,170 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

remotestaff.ph

503 ms

www.remotestaff.ph

1090 ms

hf.js

189 ms

gtm.js

122 ms

js

154 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Remotestaff.ph, 7% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Remotestaff.ph.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 189.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Remotestaff.ph main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 139.8 kB

  • Original 180.7 kB
  • After minification 176.1 kB
  • After compression 40.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 42.6 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remote Staff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 418.6 kB
  • After minification 418.6 kB
  • After compression 411.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 62.1 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB
  • After compression 62.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remotestaff.ph has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (68%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remote Staff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

remotestaff.ph

remotestaff.ph

503 ms

www.remotestaff.ph

www.remotestaff.ph

1090 ms

hf.js

hf.js

189 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

122 ms

js

js

154 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

70 ms

rs-frontend.css

rs-frontend.css

218 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

433 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

645 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

666 ms

style.css

style.css

890 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

54 ms

style.css

style.css

668 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1164 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

960 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

855 ms

a3_lazy_load.min.css

a3_lazy_load.min.css

883 ms

timed-content.css

timed-content.css

885 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1072 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1103 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

1327 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

1111 ms

sweetalert2.all.min.js

sweetalert2.all.min.js

1217 ms

timed-content.js

timed-content.js

1283 ms

css

css

108 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

1322 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

1496 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1630 ms

owl.navigation.js

owl.navigation.js

1630 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

54 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

1629 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

1630 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

1630 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

1831 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1887 ms

api.js

api.js

99 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

1886 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1853 ms

waypoints-sticky.min.js

waypoints-sticky.min.js

1853 ms

prettyPhoto.js

prettyPhoto.js

1885 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

2312 ms

functions.js

functions.js

2508 ms

flexslider.min.js

flexslider.min.js

2322 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

2321 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

51 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

2319 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

2119 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

2185 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

1991 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

1969 ms

XAc9PGdpBw8

XAc9PGdpBw8

270 ms

9th-fold-image.jpg

9th-fold-image.jpg

1216 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

1370 ms

rs-logo.png

rs-logo.png

1101 ms

mobilehome.jpg

mobilehome.jpg

2208 ms

white-fade-2.png

white-fade-2.png

1369 ms

How-Do-You-Get-and-Retain-Premium-Overseas-Clients-1.jpg

How-Do-You-Get-and-Retain-Premium-Overseas-Clients-1.jpg

2210 ms

A-Checklist-for-OFWs-Moving-Back-to-the-Philippines.jpg

A-Checklist-for-OFWs-Moving-Back-to-the-Philippines.jpg

2544 ms

feature-6-Easy-Ways-to-Improve-Your-Verbal-Communication-Skills-as-a-Customer-Service-Representative.jpg

feature-6-Easy-Ways-to-Improve-Your-Verbal-Communication-Skills-as-a-Customer-Service-Representative.jpg

2206 ms

feature-10-Common-Scams-Digital-Nomads-Should-Look-Out-For-1.jpg

feature-10-Common-Scams-Digital-Nomads-Should-Look-Out-For-1.jpg

2207 ms

fb-icon.png

fb-icon.png

1520 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

1703 ms

insta-icon.png

insta-icon.png

2206 ms

linkedin-icon.png

linkedin-icon.png

2208 ms

youtube-1.png

youtube-1.png

2207 ms

close.png

close.png

2329 ms

referral-program.png

referral-program.png

2426 ms

futura_light_bt-webfont.woff

futura_light_bt-webfont.woff

2211 ms

futura_medium_bt-webfont.woff

futura_medium_bt-webfont.woff

2115 ms

great_studio_-_bostonangelbold-bold-webfont.woff

great_studio_-_bostonangelbold-bold-webfont.woff

2206 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

15 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

219 ms

base.js

base.js

313 ms

L9LPsuILosM

L9LPsuILosM

303 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

298 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

300 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2068 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

57 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

707 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

607 ms

HaHpWE_0duTSefVExCMNVYVl6wdW_Clnq1D9J4kZC6Y.js

HaHpWE_0duTSefVExCMNVYVl6wdW_Clnq1D9J4kZC6Y.js

345 ms

embed.js

embed.js

277 ms

id

id

88 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

142 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

142 ms

Create

Create

680 ms

Create

Create

804 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

231 ms

widget.js

widget.js

512 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

35 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

36 ms

Accessibility Review

remotestaff.ph accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

remotestaff.ph best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

remotestaff.ph SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remotestaff.ph can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remotestaff.ph main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

remotestaff.ph

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Remote Staff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: