Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rempart.com

REMPART, le patrimoine comme trait d'Union

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

461 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

rempart.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rempart.com now to see the best up-to-date REMPART content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rempart.com

REMPART conçoit le patrimoine comme un trait d’union entre les individus pour construire ensemble un avenir durable et solidaire.

Visit rempart.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rempart.com page load time and found that the first response time was 461 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rempart.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.912

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rempart.com

461 ms

www.rempart.com

1435 ms

structure.css

191 ms

navigation.css

274 ms

elements.css

268 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Rempart.com, 20% (16 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rempart.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 301.7 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

853.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Rempart.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 786.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 36.3 kB

  • Original 46.0 kB
  • After minification 45.4 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 31.2 kB

  • Original 786.1 kB
  • After minification 754.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. REMPART images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 120.5 kB

  • Original 189.7 kB
  • After minification 189.7 kB
  • After compression 69.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.5 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 113.7 kB

  • Original 132.9 kB
  • After minification 96.0 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rempart.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (49%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of REMPART. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rempart.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rempart.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rempart.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rempart.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rempart.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of REMPART. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: