Tools & Wizards About Us
rendom.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

rendom.net

Rendom Lab

Page Load Speed

13.5 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

9.9 sec

Page Rendered

847 ms

rendom.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rendom.net now to see the best up-to-date Rendom content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rendom.net

Rendom lab

Visit rendom.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rendom.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 10.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rendom.net performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.031

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rendom.net

2711 ms

wp-tweet.css

292 ms

styles.css

538 ms

jss-style.min.css

545 ms

nivo-lightbox.css

539 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Rendom.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rendom.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 362.1 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

742.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rendom.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 576.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 36.4 kB
  • After minification 33.5 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 576.0 kB
  • After minification 573.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rendom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 188.5 kB

  • Original 309.1 kB
  • After minification 305.5 kB
  • After compression 120.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.5 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 142.1 kB

  • Original 183.5 kB
  • After minification 176.0 kB
  • After compression 41.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rendom.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 142.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (60%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rendom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rendom.net

rendom.net

2711 ms

wp-tweet.css

wp-tweet.css

292 ms

styles.css

styles.css

538 ms

jss-style.min.css

jss-style.min.css

545 ms

nivo-lightbox.css

nivo-lightbox.css

539 ms

default.css

default.css

552 ms

css

css

57 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

546 ms

style.css

style.css

552 ms

jquery.lazyloadxt.spinner.css

jquery.lazyloadxt.spinner.css

789 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1213 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1900 ms

jss-script.min.js

jss-script.min.js

1905 ms

nivo-lightbox.min.js

nivo-lightbox.min.js

798 ms

script.js

script.js

798 ms

a3_lazy_load.min.css

a3_lazy_load.min.css

1002 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1237 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

194 ms

less.js

less.js

1441 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

355 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1221 ms

angular.min.js

angular.min.js

493 ms

script.js

script.js

1423 ms

watch.js

watch.js

2 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

1423 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1436 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1627 ms

jquery.lazyloadxt.min.js

jquery.lazyloadxt.min.js

1626 ms

css

css

57 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

632 ms

hero2.jpg

hero2.jpg

962 ms

geforecethumb.jpg

geforecethumb.jpg

945 ms

dotascore.jpg

dotascore.jpg

746 ms

steamrendom.jpg

steamrendom.jpg

2744 ms

dotahud.jpg

dotahud.jpg

1465 ms

x_e9dab45d.jpg

x_e9dab45d.jpg

947 ms

splash2.jpg

splash2.jpg

2858 ms

tigers.gif

tigers.gif

1456 ms

me2.jpg

me2.jpg

5250 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

1203 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

2159 ms

instagram.svg

instagram.svg

2142 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

1831 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1648 ms

Accessibility Review

rendom.net accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rendom.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rendom.net SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rendom.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rendom.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rendom.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rendom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: