Tools & Wizards About Us
renget.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

renget.com

Page Load Speed

662 ms in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

279 ms

Page Rendered

320 ms

renget.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Renget content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about renget.com

Visit renget.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Renget.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 599 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

renget.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

renget.com

63 ms

all.min.css

25 ms

desktop.min.css

38 ms

css

36 ms

css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Renget.com, 53% (19 requests) were made to Images.renget.com and 19% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (107 ms) relates to the external source Images.renget.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 198.9 kB (26%)

Content Size

751.3 kB

After Optimization

552.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Renget.com main page is 751.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 516.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 27.6 kB
  • After minification 13.0 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.6 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 516.6 kB
  • After minification 501.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Renget images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 126.4 kB

  • Original 154.1 kB
  • After minification 154.0 kB
  • After compression 27.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Renget.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (11%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Renget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

renget.com

renget.com

63 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

25 ms

desktop.min.css

desktop.min.css

38 ms

css

css

36 ms

css

css

39 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

lines.png

lines.png

59 ms

43.jpg

43.jpg

62 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

46 ms

39.jpg

39.jpg

47 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

52 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

47 ms

19.jpg

19.jpg

47 ms

29.jpg

29.jpg

60 ms

37.jpg

37.jpg

65 ms

22.jpg

22.jpg

65 ms

50.jpg

50.jpg

66 ms

23.jpg

23.jpg

83 ms

34.jpg

34.jpg

74 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

72 ms

45.jpg

45.jpg

92 ms

37.jpg

37.jpg

87 ms

18.jpg

18.jpg

88 ms

26.jpg

26.jpg

107 ms

42.jpg

42.jpg

96 ms

39.jpg

39.jpg

104 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

7 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

13 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

17 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

19 ms

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nCSLrGe-fkSRw2DeVgOoWcQ.woff

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nCSLrGe-fkSRw2DeVgOoWcQ.woff

18 ms

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsFzqCfRpIA3W6ypxnPISCPA.woff

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsFzqCfRpIA3W6ypxnPISCPA.woff

17 ms

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nNeiznanRB67rGZDYkMvKPc.woff

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nNeiznanRB67rGZDYkMvKPc.woff

18 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

32 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

34 ms

Accessibility Review

renget.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

renget.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

renget.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Renget.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Renget.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

renget.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Renget. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: