Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

renoback.com

renoback.com

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

renoback.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Renoback content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about renoback.com

This domain may be for sale!

Visit renoback.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Renoback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

renoback.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

renoback.com

129 ms

www.renoback.com

584 ms

css

114 ms

slick.css

87 ms

foundation-icons.css

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 154 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Renoback.com, 8% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Renoback.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (17%)

Content Size

10.3 MB

After Optimization

8.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Renoback.com main page is 10.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 9.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 269.1 kB

  • Original 288.5 kB
  • After minification 136.0 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 152.5 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 269.1 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 795.4 kB

  • Original 9.0 MB
  • After minification 8.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Renoback images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 398.1 kB

  • Original 656.4 kB
  • After minification 652.1 kB
  • After compression 258.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 398.1 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 287.0 kB

  • Original 328.6 kB
  • After minification 263.5 kB
  • After compression 41.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Renoback.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 287.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (21%)

Requests Now

137

After Optimization

108

The browser has sent 137 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Renoback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

renoback.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Renoback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Renoback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Renoback. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: