Tools & Wizards About Us
replied.app screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

replied.app

Replied App: RSVP Text Message Invite App Service for An Event, Wedding, Birthday, etc.

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

753 ms

Page Rendered

363 ms

replied.app screenshot

About Website

Welcome to replied.app homepage info - get ready to check Replied best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about replied.app

Send Text Message Invitation and Receive Text Message RSVPs with this app - The Easiest way to gather your RSVP replies with our text message rsvp service. View them online.

Visit replied.app

Key Findings

We analyzed Replied.app page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

replied.app performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,690 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

replied.app

46 ms

www.replied.app

316 ms

bootstrap.min.css

68 ms

css

51 ms

font-awesome.min.css

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Replied.app, 12% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) belongs to the original domain Replied.app.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 78.7 kB (50%)

Content Size

157.1 kB

After Optimization

78.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Replied.app main page is 157.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 62.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 49.6 kB

  • Original 57.9 kB
  • After minification 38.1 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.8 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 584 B

  • Original 62.0 kB
  • After minification 61.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Replied images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 26.0 kB

  • Original 32.5 kB
  • After minification 32.5 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Replied.app needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (36%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Replied. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

replied.app

replied.app

46 ms

www.replied.app

www.replied.app

316 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

68 ms

css

css

51 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

65 ms

newhome.min.css

newhome.min.css

27 ms

js

js

131 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

99 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

98 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

138 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

100 ms

core.js

core.js

157 ms

replied-app-logo-banner.webp

replied-app-logo-banner.webp

66 ms

repliedapprsvpbanner.webp

repliedapprsvpbanner.webp

146 ms

phone.png

phone.png

156 ms

mw.png

mw.png

144 ms

digitaljournal.jpeg

digitaljournal.jpeg

143 ms

pw.png

pw.png

156 ms

pp.png

pp.png

156 ms

textrsvpcardwedding.webp

textrsvpcardwedding.webp

156 ms

textconvorsvp.webp

textconvorsvp.webp

154 ms

Screenshotdashboard.webp

Screenshotdashboard.webp

151 ms

textmessageinvitations.webp

textmessageinvitations.webp

189 ms

screenshottextinvite.webp

screenshottextinvite.webp

190 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

91 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

14 ms

Accessibility Review

replied.app accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

replied.app best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

replied.app SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Replied.app can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Replied.app main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

replied.app

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Replied. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: