1.2 sec in total
46 ms
753 ms
363 ms
Welcome to replied.app homepage info - get ready to check Replied best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about replied.app
Send Text Message Invitation and Receive Text Message RSVPs with this app - The Easiest way to gather your RSVP replies with our text message rsvp service. View them online.
Visit replied.appWe analyzed Replied.app page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
replied.app performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
42/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value1,690 ms
11/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
46 ms
316 ms
68 ms
51 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Replied.app, 12% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) belongs to the original domain Replied.app.
Page size can be reduced by 76.2 kB (49%)
154.5 kB
78.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Replied.app main page is 154.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 62.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.8 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 584 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Replied images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 26.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Replied.app needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (36%)
22
14
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Replied. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
replied.app
46 ms
www.replied.app
316 ms
bootstrap.min.css
68 ms
css
51 ms
font-awesome.min.css
65 ms
newhome.min.css
27 ms
js
131 ms
jquery.min.js
99 ms
bootstrap.min.js
98 ms
gtm.js
138 ms
fbevents.js
100 ms
core.js
157 ms
replied-app-logo-banner.webp
66 ms
repliedapprsvpbanner.webp
146 ms
phone.png
156 ms
mw.png
144 ms
digitaljournal.jpeg
143 ms
pw.png
156 ms
pp.png
156 ms
textrsvpcardwedding.webp
156 ms
textconvorsvp.webp
154 ms
Screenshotdashboard.webp
151 ms
textmessageinvitations.webp
189 ms
screenshottextinvite.webp
190 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
91 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
14 ms
replied.app accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
replied.app best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
replied.app SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Replied.app can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Replied.app main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
replied.app
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Replied. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: