Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

replyua.net

Replyua.net

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

499 ms

replyua.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to replyua.net homepage info - get ready to check Replyua best content for Ukraine right away, or after learning these important things about replyua.net

Наш проект является стоком новостей, статей, самая актуальная информация, новости Украины и мира, политика, блоги, наука, шоу бизнес

Visit replyua.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Replyua.net page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

replyua.net performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

replyua.net

43 ms

replyua.net

926 ms

style1.css

18 ms

replyua-banner.png

24 ms

f291b974ea6d34c9f8fd5c32f4da421c.jpg

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Replyua.net, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (926 ms) belongs to the original domain Replyua.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 119.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Replyua.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 47.6 kB

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 71.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Replyua images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 511 B

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 6.2 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Replyua.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Replyua. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

replyua.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

replyua.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

replyua.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Replyua.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Replyua.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Replyua. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: