Tools & Wizards About Us
reputationmaintenance.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

reputationmaintenance.com

Online Reputation Management Agency, ORM Service Solution in India - Reputation Maintenance

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

627 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

847 ms

reputationmaintenance.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reputationmaintenance.com homepage info - get ready to check Reputation Maintenance best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about reputationmaintenance.com

Reputation Maintenance is a full reputation management agency serving individuals, celebrities, small and midsize corporate businesses with a complete range of (ORM) online reputation management servi...

Visit reputationmaintenance.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reputationmaintenance.com page load time and found that the first response time was 627 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reputationmaintenance.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reputationmaintenance.com

627 ms

reputationmaintenance.com

835 ms

www.reputationmaintenance.com

1227 ms

js

60 ms

bootstrap.min.css

202 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Reputationmaintenance.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Reputationmaintenance.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.2 kB (9%)

Content Size

554.2 kB

After Optimization

503.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reputationmaintenance.com main page is 554.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 332.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 39.5 kB

  • Original 48.4 kB
  • After minification 39.5 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 332.6 kB
  • After minification 325.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reputation Maintenance images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 105.9 kB
  • After compression 104.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 67.3 kB
  • After minification 67.3 kB
  • After compression 63.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reputationmaintenance.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (49%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reputation Maintenance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reputationmaintenance.com

reputationmaintenance.com

627 ms

reputationmaintenance.com

reputationmaintenance.com

835 ms

www.reputationmaintenance.com

www.reputationmaintenance.com

1227 ms

js

js

60 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

202 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

396 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

590 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

594 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

599 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.css

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.css

603 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

620 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

621 ms

style9.css

style9.css

783 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

788 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

994 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

842 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1029 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

843 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

972 ms

mixitup.min.js

mixitup.min.js

983 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1011 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1044 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

1164 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1179 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

1192 ms

about-us-2.jpg

about-us-2.jpg

1989 ms

Africa.png

Africa.png

1257 ms

Australia.png

Australia.png

1257 ms

Canada.png

Canada.png

1356 ms

Dubai.png

Dubai.png

1373 ms

India.png

India.png

1388 ms

UK.png

UK.png

1437 ms

USA.png

USA.png

1440 ms

Blog1.jpg

Blog1.jpg

1547 ms

Blog2.jpg

Blog2.jpg

1568 ms

Blog3.jpg

Blog3.jpg

1584 ms

client-1.jpg

client-1.jpg

1642 ms

client-2.jpg

client-2.jpg

1645 ms

client-3.jpg

client-3.jpg

1739 ms

49 ms

52 ms

45 ms

20 ms

26 ms

slider-bg-1.svg

slider-bg-1.svg

967 ms

hero-bg5.jpg

hero-bg5.jpg

984 ms

themify.woff@-fvbane

themify.woff@-fvbane

1213 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1422 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1094 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1317 ms

www.reputationmaintenance.com

www.reputationmaintenance.com

200 ms

Accessibility Review

reputationmaintenance.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

reputationmaintenance.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reputationmaintenance.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reputationmaintenance.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reputationmaintenance.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reputationmaintenance.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reputation Maintenance. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: