24.4 sec in total
1.2 sec
22.7 sec
417 ms
Visit res.com.mo now to see the best up-to-date Res content for Macao and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about res.com.mo
來來電器,我地信賴嘅電器顧問
Visit res.com.moWe analyzed Res.com.mo page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 23.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
res.com.mo performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
1246 ms
591 ms
30 ms
596 ms
955 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Res.com.mo, 18% (12 requests) were made to 0 and 7% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Res.com.mo.
Page size can be reduced by 754.3 kB (22%)
3.4 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Res.com.mo main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 530.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Res needs image optimization as it can save up to 530.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 134.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Res.com.mo needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (52%)
52
25
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Res. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
res.com.mo
1246 ms
font-awesome.min.css
591 ms
font-awesome.min.css
30 ms
modal.css
596 ms
style.css
955 ms
responsive.css
596 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
1815 ms
js
74 ms
config.js
599 ms
Util.js
1528 ms
index.js
2625 ms
global.js
699 ms
79402a892f3e1cd716dd0e3e50b8cf60
918 ms
img_logo.png
292 ms
49_web.jpg
6729 ms
48_web.jpg
2950 ms
45_web.jpg
2093 ms
42_web.jpg
7016 ms
47_web.jpg
6299 ms
43_web.jpg
9253 ms
39_web.jpg
8547 ms
40_web.jpg
8950 ms
261.jpg
19879 ms
58_icon.jpg
8905 ms
55_icon.jpg
8908 ms
32_icon.jpg
13013 ms
51_icon.jpg
13219 ms
45_icon.jpg
11438 ms
49_icon.jpg
11407 ms
34_icon.jpg
10387 ms
footer_icon_1.png
10735 ms
footer_icon_2.png
11109 ms
footer_icon_3.png
11377 ms
footer_icon_4.png
11692 ms
footer_icon_5.png
11707 ms
footer_icon_6.png
11728 ms
appstore.png
12108 ms
playstore.png
12111 ms
footer_icon_7.jpg
13865 ms
img_fb.png
12395 ms
00e508f6215e46e4652c33dd4c0248df
990 ms
52176826e59f75ba44b94b7392078fae
991 ms
7f8d227477bcd84425ba31295af95301
640 ms
15bd2b980e90600aa8e5d0800b8d9f5b
1018 ms
b48d173fb3741de92d9d7919f20dba3a
1017 ms
3a4a3fa62ac9b8587fc0451feb83567b
1536 ms
23f497eaf6f32a269162ea4a358f8d91
1170 ms
085720b9f8c7da382220f6970c290d9f
1549 ms
558fb19e679890c25fbab728b9c1ea4d
1336 ms
4a66df16ca3eb8e814a3196bc1204759
1353 ms
e783c3aaf4ccee16bf6cd93e7ddd0d63
1352 ms
gtm.js
99 ms
icon_home.png
12368 ms
btn_prev.png
12717 ms
btn_next.png
12707 ms
img_albums_tag.png
12984 ms
icon_enter.png
12992 ms
conversion_async.js
28 ms
167 ms
134 ms
analytics.js
37 ms
btn_next_hlt.png
12208 ms
collect
19 ms
common.js
89 ms
util.js
152 ms
stats.js
88 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
257 ms
res.com.mo accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
res.com.mo best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
res.com.mo SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Res.com.mo can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Res.com.mo main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
res.com.mo
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Res. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: