Tools & Wizards About Us
res.ridgefield.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

res.ridgefield.org

Ridgebury Elementary School |

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

35 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

206 ms

res.ridgefield.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to res.ridgefield.org homepage info - get ready to check Res Ridgefield best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about res.ridgefield.org

Welcome to the Ridgebury Elementary School website. We like to think of ourselves as “the kindness school,” where learning and kindness go in hand in our pre-kindergarten through fifth grade classroom...

Visit res.ridgefield.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Res.ridgefield.org page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

res.ridgefield.org performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.117

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

res.ridgefield.org

35 ms

res.ridgefield.org

715 ms

normalize.css

290 ms

sm-core-css.css

297 ms

main.css

380 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Res.ridgefield.org, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Res.ridgefield.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.6 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

909.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Res.ridgefield.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 789.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

  • Original 37.3 kB
  • After minification 35.6 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 789.4 kB
  • After minification 779.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Res Ridgefield images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 88.2 kB

  • Original 193.5 kB
  • After minification 191.2 kB
  • After compression 105.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 36.1 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Res.ridgefield.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (69%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Res Ridgefield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

res.ridgefield.org

res.ridgefield.org

35 ms

res.ridgefield.org

res.ridgefield.org

715 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

290 ms

sm-core-css.css

sm-core-css.css

297 ms

main.css

main.css

380 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

jquery.smartmenus-and-keyboard.js

jquery.smartmenus-and-keyboard.js

357 ms

css

css

49 ms

css

css

67 ms

2f7f3b6cb0.js

2f7f3b6cb0.js

43 ms

animatedcollapse.js

animatedcollapse.js

294 ms

slideshow-autoscroll.css

slideshow-autoscroll.css

396 ms

carousel.js

carousel.js

563 ms

carouselButtons.js

carouselButtons.js

569 ms

carouselItem.js

carouselItem.js

582 ms

pauseButton.js

pauseButton.js

638 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

453 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

482 ms

spuds.js

spuds.js

404 ms

OwlCarousel.css

OwlCarousel.css

723 ms

OwlTheme.css

OwlTheme.css

756 ms

OwlCarousel.js

OwlCarousel.js

838 ms

element.js

element.js

101 ms

2f7f3b6cb0.css

2f7f3b6cb0.css

13 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

11 ms

main.css

main.css

561 ms

graphic_RidgeburySchoolSign1.jpg

graphic_RidgeburySchoolSign1.jpg

531 ms

homeslide_020924_011.jpg

homeslide_020924_011.jpg

670 ms

homeslide_020924_021.jpg

homeslide_020924_021.jpg

1118 ms

homeslide_020924_031.jpg

homeslide_020924_031.jpg

875 ms

homeslide_020924_041.jpg

homeslide_020924_041.jpg

908 ms

homeslide_020924_051.jpg

homeslide_020924_051.jpg

961 ms

graphic_home_maryscalise1.jpg

graphic_home_maryscalise1.jpg

948 ms

graphic_home_logo.jpg

graphic_home_logo.jpg

933 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

18 ms

tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf

tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf

23 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

26 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

23 ms

MwQ0bhv11fWD6QsAVOZrt0M_.ttf

MwQ0bhv11fWD6QsAVOZrt0M_.ttf

24 ms

spinner_trumba.gif

spinner_trumba.gif

133 ms

s.aspx

s.aspx

274 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

70 ms

core.js

core.js

93 ms

css

css

25 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

js

js

62 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

36 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

35 ms

Accessibility Review

res.ridgefield.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

res.ridgefield.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

res.ridgefield.org SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Res.ridgefield.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Res.ridgefield.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

res.ridgefield.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Res Ridgefield. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: