Tools & Wizards About Us
rescripto.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

rescripto.com

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

380 ms

rescripto.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rescripto.com now to see the best up-to-date Rescripto content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rescripto.com

Visit rescripto.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rescripto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rescripto.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rescripto.com

214 ms

rescripto.com

256 ms

www.rescriptoai.com

210 ms

www.rescriptoai.com

835 ms

css2

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Rescripto.com, 83% (33 requests) were made to Rescriptoai.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Rescriptoai.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 268.7 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

923.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rescripto.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 588.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 238.6 kB

  • Original 269.9 kB
  • After minification 224.8 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 238.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 617 B

  • Original 588.6 kB
  • After minification 588.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rescripto images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 175 B

  • Original 301.1 kB
  • After minification 301.1 kB
  • After compression 300.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 29.3 kB

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 3.5 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rescripto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (47%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rescripto. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rescripto.com

rescripto.com

214 ms

rescripto.com

rescripto.com

256 ms

www.rescriptoai.com

www.rescriptoai.com

210 ms

www.rescriptoai.com

www.rescriptoai.com

835 ms

css2

css2

40 ms

flickity.min.css

flickity.min.css

224 ms

toastr.min.css

toastr.min.css

244 ms

landing-page-dc5370af.css

landing-page-dc5370af.css

357 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

114 ms

app-abaa0f1c.js

app-abaa0f1c.js

284 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

467 ms

vanillajs-scrollspy.min.js

vanillajs-scrollspy.min.js

272 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

478 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

466 ms

frontend-animations.js

frontend-animations.js

482 ms

fslightbox.js

fslightbox.js

490 ms

toastr.min.js

toastr.min.js

552 ms

s6bu--rescripto-ai-logo.png

s6bu--rescripto-ai-logo.png

207 ms

text-generator.jpg

text-generator.jpg

336 ms

image-generator.jpg

image-generator.jpg

597 ms

code-generator.jpg

code-generator.jpg

407 ms

ai-chat.jpg

ai-chat.jpg

400 ms

ai-speech.jpg

ai-speech.jpg

468 ms

voiceover.jpg

voiceover.jpg

584 ms

NZBW-multilingual.png

NZBW-multilingual.png

721 ms

RAhq-affiliate-system.png

RAhq-affiliate-system.png

713 ms

mPWB-easy-export.png

mPWB-easy-export.png

633 ms

steps-bg.jpg

steps-bg.jpg

775 ms

world-map.png

world-map.png

1232 ms

202306020840avatar-1.jpg

202306020840avatar-1.jpg

860 ms

202306020840avatar-3.jpg

202306020840avatar-3.jpg

907 ms

202306020840avatar-2.jpg

202306020840avatar-2.jpg

985 ms

1c.svg

1c.svg

921 ms

2c.svg

2c.svg

976 ms

4c.svg

4c.svg

1071 ms

5c.svg

5c.svg

1114 ms

6c.svg

6c.svg

1120 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

388 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

38 ms

ads

ads

92 ms

Accessibility Review

rescripto.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rescripto.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rescripto.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rescripto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rescripto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rescripto.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rescripto. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: