Tools & Wizards About Us
research-journal.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

research-journal.org

Submit a scientific paper, academic publishing in International Research Journal (Meždunarodnyj naučno-issledovatel’skij žurnal) | International Resea...

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

435 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

309 ms

research-journal.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Research Journal content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about research-journal.org

International Research Journal (Meždunarodnyj naučno-issledovatel’skij žurnal) is an open access scientific journal that has audience from more then 17 countries (Russia, CIS, EU, USA). The materials ...

Visit research-journal.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Research-journal.org page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

research-journal.org performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,640 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

research-journal.org

435 ms

research-journal.org

529 ms

en

4286 ms

gtm.js

64 ms

commons.a9abfe1d.chunk.css

392 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Research-journal.org, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Research-journal.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (71%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

648.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Research-journal.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 839.1 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 171.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 839.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 44.3 kB

  • Original 271.3 kB
  • After minification 227.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Research Journal needs image optimization as it can save up to 44.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 473.5 kB

  • Original 650.0 kB
  • After minification 537.0 kB
  • After compression 176.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 473.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 230.5 kB

  • Original 304.2 kB
  • After minification 243.0 kB
  • After compression 73.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Research-journal.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (67%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Research Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

research-journal.org

research-journal.org

435 ms

research-journal.org

research-journal.org

529 ms

en

en

4286 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

64 ms

commons.a9abfe1d.chunk.css

commons.a9abfe1d.chunk.css

392 ms

styles.6f1589a3.chunk.css

styles.6f1589a3.chunk.css

516 ms

d52e0eee-d4aa-4537-a8af-405ce0f2650a.png

d52e0eee-d4aa-4537-a8af-405ce0f2650a.png

602 ms

agris-logo.png

agris-logo.png

375 ms

logomn1.jpeg

logomn1.jpeg

414 ms

road-issn_0.png

road-issn_0.png

421 ms

google_scholar_fVRmQSv.png

google_scholar_fVRmQSv.png

498 ms

vak21.jpeg

vak21.jpeg

636 ms

BASE_search_engine_logo.svg-copy.png

BASE_search_engine_logo.svg-copy.png

679 ms

elibrary_wide.gif

elibrary_wide.gif

583 ms

GeoRef.png

GeoRef.png

622 ms

heallinl.png

heallinl.png

636 ms

logo_info.png

logo_info.png

677 ms

logo_openaire-1.png

logo_openaire-1.png

724 ms

logo_wcmasthead_en.png

logo_wcmasthead_en.png

746 ms

index.js

index.js

599 ms

_app.js

_app.js

606 ms

webpack-8ed9452df514b4d17d80.js

webpack-8ed9452df514b4d17d80.js

514 ms

commons.f2a428f45e47a636f8fe.js

commons.f2a428f45e47a636f8fe.js

926 ms

styles.7f1fa0611042e073fd28.js

styles.7f1fa0611042e073fd28.js

556 ms

main-643e910cd4d277497595.js

main-643e910cd4d277497595.js

579 ms

cd48a60222a9a0484019047b32d01c93.woff

cd48a60222a9a0484019047b32d01c93.woff

360 ms

05dd28b61a8738d06d4d4e0a3392d2b0.woff

05dd28b61a8738d06d4d4e0a3392d2b0.woff

519 ms

f79a5ae7427e2ac5166b6ac81b3e006e.woff

f79a5ae7427e2ac5166b6ac81b3e006e.woff

419 ms

dbfd62ddb2336731b7ddf820274b24c5.woff

dbfd62ddb2336731b7ddf820274b24c5.woff

438 ms

82043238353ff014217c875a9e671f4a.woff

82043238353ff014217c875a9e671f4a.woff

449 ms

Accessibility Review

research-journal.org accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

research-journal.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

research-journal.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Research-journal.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Research-journal.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

research-journal.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Research Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: