Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

researchposters.com

ResearchPosters.com – Print, ePoster, and Virtual Poster Sessions

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

104 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

931 ms

researchposters.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to researchposters.com homepage info - get ready to check Research Posters best content right away, or after learning these important things about researchposters.com

We are the experts in research posters with an engaging virtual poster session platform, quality scientific poster printing, free templates, and unmatched service.

Visit researchposters.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Researchposters.com page load time and found that the first response time was 104 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

researchposters.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

researchposters.com

104 ms

www.researchposters.com

220 ms

analytics.js

31 ms

bootstrap.css

107 ms

scrolling-nav.css

162 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Researchposters.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Genigraphics.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (791 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (23%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Researchposters.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 80.1 kB

  • Original 97.1 kB
  • After minification 72.7 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.4 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 919.0 kB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Research Posters needs image optimization as it can save up to 919.0 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 74.9 kB

  • Original 470.4 kB
  • After minification 470.4 kB
  • After compression 395.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.9 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Researchposters.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (52%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Research Posters. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

researchposters.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

researchposters.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

researchposters.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Researchposters.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Researchposters.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Research Posters. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: