1.3 sec in total
369 ms
858 ms
119 ms
Welcome to researchranking.org homepage info - get ready to check Research Ranking best content right away, or after learning these important things about researchranking.org
European research institutions ranking based on funding and networking perfomance derived from data provided by the European Commissions directory of projects, CORDIS.
Visit researchranking.orgWe analyzed Researchranking.org page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 977 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
researchranking.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value2.5 s
90/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.112
86/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
369 ms
45 ms
111 ms
28 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Researchranking.org, 54% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (369 ms) belongs to the original domain Researchranking.org.
Page size can be reduced by 24.7 kB (21%)
117.3 kB
92.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Researchranking.org main page is 117.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 76.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Research Ranking needs image optimization as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 394 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Researchranking.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 394 B or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (19%)
16
13
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Research Ranking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
researchranking.org
369 ms
bootstrap.min.css
45 ms
style.css
111 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
popper.min.js
36 ms
bootstrap.min.js
59 ms
css
26 ms
css
44 ms
researchranking.png
111 ms
games18.png
221 ms
data-analytics.png
220 ms
statistics2.png
328 ms
timeline.png
221 ms
timeline2.png
331 ms
euro58.png
229 ms
gorilla.png
329 ms
new.png
330 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
8 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
37 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4vaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
32 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B5OaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B5caVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
40 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4iaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
34 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4jaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
39 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4saVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
39 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4kaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
60 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4taVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
62 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff
42 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
66 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4vaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
41 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x5OaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
63 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x5caVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
68 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4iaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
71 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4jaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
97 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4saVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
67 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4kaVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
97 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4taVQUwaEQXjN_mQ.woff
67 ms
researchranking.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
researchranking.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
researchranking.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Researchranking.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Researchranking.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
researchranking.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Research Ranking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: