2.6 sec in total
190 ms
2.2 sec
229 ms
Welcome to residentscreening.com homepage info - get ready to check Residentscreening best content right away, or after learning these important things about residentscreening.com
Visit residentscreening.comWe analyzed Residentscreening.com page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
residentscreening.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
190 ms
605 ms
442 ms
233 ms
217 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Residentscreening.com, 66% (41 requests) were made to Corelogic.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (703 ms) relates to the external source Corelogic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 974.7 kB (66%)
1.5 MB
506.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Residentscreening.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 959.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Residentscreening needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 700.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 700.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Residentscreening.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 145.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (71%)
58
17
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Residentscreening. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
residentscreening.com
190 ms
multifamily-housing-solutions.aspx
605 ms
global.css
442 ms
productnav.css
233 ms
main.css
217 ms
jquery-1.8.2.js
703 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
601 ms
jquery.jcarousel.js
373 ms
swfobject.js
307 ms
global.js
463 ms
jquery.fancybox-2.1.5.pack.js
452 ms
jquery.fancybox-2.1.5.css
452 ms
forms.js
519 ms
mobilecompatibility.js
530 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
538 ms
connection-min.js
551 ms
animation-min.js
597 ms
datasource-min.js
607 ms
autocomplete-min.js
616 ms
searchtextsuggestions.js
633 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.5.js
679 ms
search.js
671 ms
industrypage.css
685 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
624 ms
WebResource.axd
690 ms
WebResource.axd
440 ms
webtrends.js
440 ms
demandbase-1.0.0-min.js
46 ms
cse.js
63 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
logo.png
82 ms
asset_upload_file846_36192.jpg
83 ms
report_cover_generic.png
93 ms
download-button.jpg
94 ms
logo_footer.png
81 ms
header_bg.jpg
86 ms
sprite_home_01.png
218 ms
asset_upload_file95_26690.jpg
262 ms
collect
25 ms
table-sprite.png
169 ms
bg_sprite3.png
175 ms
jsapi
23 ms
wtid.js
70 ms
default+en.css
4 ms
minimalist.css
17 ms
default+en.I.js
14 ms
minimalist.css
47 ms
ip.json
149 ms
insight.min.js
66 ms
country_dd.min.css
131 ms
country_dd_legacy.min.js
134 ms
elqCfg.min.js
59 ms
dcs.gif
48 ms
svrGP
73 ms
svrGP
65 ms
country-dropdown-json.aspx
83 ms
svrGP.aspx
27 ms
print.css
81 ms
async-ads.js
32 ms
small-logo.png
24 ms
main.css
86 ms
16 ms
residentscreening.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
residentscreening.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
residentscreening.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Residentscreening.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Residentscreening.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
residentscreening.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Residentscreening. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: