Tools & Wizards About Us
resortchoice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

resortchoice.com

Holiday Homes to Rent in Spain | Apartments to Rent in Spain | Holiday Accommodation

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

228 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

767 ms

resortchoice.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Resortchoice content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about resortchoice.com

Find the best Holiday Homes for your vacation, Luxury Villas and Costa Calida holiday Apartments. Resort Choice offers holiday accommodations in Murcia. 500+ properties in all across Spain. Get booked...

Visit resortchoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Resortchoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

resortchoice.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.347

32/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

resortchoice.com

228 ms

www.resortchoice.com

208 ms

www.resortchoice.com

2376 ms

fbevents.js

28 ms

gtm.js

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Resortchoice.com, 28% (24 requests) were made to Fwk.avantio.com and 23% (20 requests) were made to Crs.avantio.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Resortchoice.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 592.7 kB (14%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Resortchoice.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 480.2 kB

  • Original 545.1 kB
  • After minification 529.4 kB
  • After compression 65.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 480.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 96.1 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resortchoice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 79.9 kB
  • After minification 79.9 kB
  • After compression 79.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 121.4 kB
  • After minification 121.4 kB
  • After compression 104.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resortchoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (55%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resortchoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

resortchoice.com

resortchoice.com

228 ms

www.resortchoice.com

www.resortchoice.com

208 ms

www.resortchoice.com

www.resortchoice.com

2376 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

28 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

89 ms

api.js

api.js

83 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

52 ms

bottom-banner.css

bottom-banner.css

367 ms

flexible-search.css

flexible-search.css

374 ms

xajax.js

xajax.js

422 ms

widgetmap.css

widgetmap.css

429 ms

owl.carousel_v2.css

owl.carousel_v2.css

431 ms

loader.css

loader.css

450 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

454 ms

js

js

78 ms

detectElement.js

detectElement.js

466 ms

Maps.js

Maps.js

518 ms

GoogleMaps.js

GoogleMaps.js

521 ms

markerclusterer.js

markerclusterer.js

517 ms

oms.min.js

oms.min.js

523 ms

owl.carousel_v2.js

owl.carousel_v2.js

631 ms

widgetMaps.js

widgetMaps.js

555 ms

its--style.css

its--style.css

210 ms

update.css

update.css

414 ms

fontlibrary.css

fontlibrary.css

415 ms

style.css

style.css

303 ms

top.css

top.css

306 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

617 ms

crs_currency.js

crs_currency.js

618 ms

stringsFunctions.js

stringsFunctions.js

620 ms

formulario_miniselects.js

formulario_miniselects.js

620 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

415 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

416 ms

its--scripts.js

its--scripts.js

416 ms

animations.js

animations.js

445 ms

mobileMenu.js

mobileMenu.js

462 ms

lazyload.js

lazyload.js

478 ms

loader_map.css

loader_map.css

642 ms

main.js

main.js

322 ms

sendForm.js

sendForm.js

485 ms

i18n_EN.js

i18n_EN.js

487 ms

exit-intent.js

exit-intent.js

487 ms

lightSlider.js

lightSlider.js

516 ms

lightGrid.js

lightGrid.js

548 ms

ofertas.js

ofertas.js

566 ms

logo.png

logo.png

439 ms

aniversary.png

aniversary.png

938 ms

instantbooking.png

instantbooking.png

336 ms

paymentprotection.png

paymentprotection.png

337 ms

bestprice.png

bestprice.png

337 ms

listyourproperty.png

listyourproperty.png

368 ms

logo_vv.jpg

logo_vv.jpg

390 ms

google-pay.svg

google-pay.svg

402 ms

apple-pay.svg

apple-pay.svg

406 ms

whatsapp.png

whatsapp.png

497 ms

bank-transfer_white.svg

bank-transfer_white.svg

498 ms

mastercard.svg

mastercard.svg

500 ms

visa.svg

visa.svg

538 ms

paypal_white.svg

paypal_white.svg

560 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

15 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

639 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

638 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

281 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

674 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

630 ms

PlayfairDisplay.ttf

PlayfairDisplay.ttf

607 ms

Quicksand-Regular.ttf

Quicksand-Regular.ttf

339 ms

open-sans.ttf

open-sans.ttf

641 ms

open-sans-light.ttf

open-sans-light.ttf

640 ms

open-sans-bold.ttf

open-sans-bold.ttf

604 ms

Location-Mar-de-Cristal.JPG

Location-Mar-de-Cristal.JPG

592 ms

Location-La-Manga-del-Mar-Menor.jpg

Location-La-Manga-del-Mar-Menor.jpg

597 ms

Location-Playa-Honda.JPG

Location-Playa-Honda.JPG

599 ms

Location-Roda-Golf.JPG

Location-Roda-Golf.JPG

598 ms

Location-Los-Nietos.JPG

Location-Los-Nietos.JPG

635 ms

Location-Cabo-de-Palos.JPG

Location-Cabo-de-Palos.JPG

732 ms

manga.jpg

manga.jpg

731 ms

alcazares.jpg

alcazares.jpg

732 ms

mazarron.jpg

mazarron.jpg

732 ms

pinatar.jpg

pinatar.jpg

733 ms

orihuela.jpg

orihuela.jpg

773 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

348 ms

costa_blanca.jpg

costa_blanca.jpg

251 ms

costa_calida.jpg

costa_calida.jpg

326 ms

experiencias.jpg

experiencias.jpg

253 ms

fontlibrary.woff

fontlibrary.woff

113 ms

Accessibility Review

resortchoice.com accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

resortchoice.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

resortchoice.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resortchoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resortchoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

resortchoice.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Resortchoice. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: