2.6 sec in total
228 ms
2.3 sec
111 ms
Visit resource.org now to see the best up-to-date Resource content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about resource.org
Public.Resource.Org, home of the Seal of Approval.
Visit resource.orgWe analyzed Resource.org page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
resource.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value2,120 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
228 ms
647 ms
216 ms
435 ms
220 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Resource.org, 76% (35 requests) were made to Public.resource.org and 7% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (934 ms) relates to the external source Public.resource.org.
Page size can be reduced by 519.4 kB (49%)
1.1 MB
548.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Resource.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 400.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resource images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 262.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resource.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (12%)
42
37
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resource. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
resource.org
228 ms
public.resource.org
647 ms
setup.css
216 ms
text.css
435 ms
toggle.js
220 ms
switcher.js
224 ms
2tOJdGaMvVw
121 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
79 ms
foil.seal.oregon.png
234 ms
foil.seal.justice.png
361 ms
foil.seal.gao.png
148 ms
foil.seal.itu.png
362 ms
foil.seal.sec.png
234 ms
foil.seal.si.png
498 ms
foil.seal.white2.png
499 ms
frontpage.seal.tilt.png
432 ms
frontpage.seal.upright.png
359 ms
foil.seal.uspto.png
505 ms
foil.seal.uscourts.png
373 ms
foil.seal.copyright.png
442 ms
foil.seal.house.png
446 ms
foil.seal.bsc.ca.gov.png
683 ms
foil.seal.gpo.png
589 ms
foil.seal.doc.alpha.png
517 ms
foil.seal.presidential.png
712 ms
foil.seal.fjc.png
568 ms
foil.seal.obverse.png
934 ms
bg_head_bottom_nav.jpg
588 ms
bg_main_withnav.jpg
640 ms
bg_corner_topleft.gif
660 ms
bg_corner_topright.gif
660 ms
currents.png
712 ms
bottom.gray.png
731 ms
pamphlet_icon.jpg
880 ms
8778041_cover.jpg
824 ms
bears.png
925 ms
bg_foot.jpg
783 ms
support.PD.red.png
802 ms
pixel.gif
70 ms
www-embed-player-vflZsBgOl.css
70 ms
www-embed-player.js
98 ms
base.js
172 ms
6BOEML_YqI6cKINK5dmh8ZufcXg7sBa4jeB-I9gQ0xI.js
37 ms
ad_status.js
36 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
80 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
92 ms
resource.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
resource.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
resource.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resource.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resource.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
resource.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Resource. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: