803 ms in total
178 ms
496 ms
129 ms
Visit resourcefinder.co now to see the best up-to-date Resourcefinder content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about resourcefinder.co
Visit resourcefinder.coWe analyzed Resourcefinder.co page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 625 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
resourcefinder.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value1.0 s
100/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value2,500 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.068
96/100
15%
Value5.2 s
74/100
10%
178 ms
11 ms
28 ms
50 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Resourcefinder.co, 24% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) belongs to the original domain Resourcefinder.co.
Page size can be reduced by 24.8 kB (15%)
160.7 kB
135.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Resourcefinder.co main page is 160.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 79.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.9 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resourcefinder images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 15.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resourcefinder.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (25%)
12
9
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resourcefinder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
resourcefinder.co
178 ms
reset.css
11 ms
expiration.css
28 ms
css
50 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jcarousellite.min.js
27 ms
global.js
27 ms
bg-body.jpg
206 ms
ga.js
194 ms
img-co-logo-no-tm.gif
24 ms
suspension_bg2.jpg
24 ms
Dropping_Domains_Landing_Page_en.jpg
24 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
32 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
38 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
42 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
resourcefinder.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
resourcefinder.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
resourcefinder.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resourcefinder.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Resourcefinder.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
resourcefinder.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Resourcefinder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: