Tools & Wizards About Us
resscott.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

resscott.com

RESSCOTT LTD.

Page Load Speed

11.3 sec in total

First Response

220 ms

Resources Loaded

10 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

resscott.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RESSCOTT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about resscott.com

RESSCOTT is an ISO9001 certified, engineering based Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency based company in Trinidad and Tobago.

Visit resscott.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Resscott.com page load time and found that the first response time was 220 ms and then it took 11 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

resscott.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,170 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

resscott.com

220 ms

www.resscott.com

3063 ms

formidableforms.css

243 ms

blocks-checkout.css

188 ms

utilities.css

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Resscott.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Resscott.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 826.9 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Resscott.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 171.5 kB

  • Original 209.4 kB
  • After minification 206.0 kB
  • After compression 37.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 118.1 kB
  • After minification 118.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RESSCOTT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 569.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 743.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 569.0 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 86.3 kB

  • Original 242.4 kB
  • After minification 242.2 kB
  • After compression 156.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resscott.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 90 (96%)

Requests Now

94

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RESSCOTT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

resscott.com

resscott.com

220 ms

www.resscott.com

www.resscott.com

3063 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

243 ms

blocks-checkout.css

blocks-checkout.css

188 ms

utilities.css

utilities.css

193 ms

extendify-utilities.css

extendify-utilities.css

194 ms

styles.css

styles.css

346 ms

bundle.css

bundle.css

255 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

258 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

264 ms

wppopups-base.css

wppopups-base.css

307 ms

style.css

style.css

318 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

324 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

390 ms

fancybox.min.css

fancybox.min.css

371 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

384 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

396 ms

main.css

main.css

529 ms

update.css

update.css

440 ms

css

css

37 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

449 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

462 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

457 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

505 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

514 ms

custom.css

custom.css

522 ms

global.css

global.css

540 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

568 ms

woocommerce-custom.css

woocommerce-custom.css

581 ms

woocommerce-update.css

woocommerce-update.css

589 ms

css

css

33 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

595 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

592 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

689 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

648 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

659 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

657 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

668 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

715 ms

w.js

w.js

16 ms

utilities.js

utilities.js

546 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

715 ms

bundle.es5.js

bundle.es5.js

691 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

525 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

534 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

539 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

572 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

609 ms

chart.min.js

chart.min.js

607 ms

counter.min.js

counter.min.js

563 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

559 ms

fancybox.min.js

fancybox.min.js

589 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

572 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

576 ms

ofi.min.js

ofi.min.js

578 ms

range-slider.min.js

range-slider.min.js

541 ms

swipe.min.js

swipe.min.js

542 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

563 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

559 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

529 ms

g.gif

g.gif

17 ms

elementor-custom.css

elementor-custom.css

408 ms

post-1131.css

post-1131.css

408 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

410 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

413 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

413 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

413 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

413 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

414 ms

wppopups.js

wppopups.js

414 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

416 ms

index.js

index.js

414 ms

index.js

index.js

415 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

416 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

417 ms

smooth-scroll.polyfills.min.js

smooth-scroll.polyfills.min.js

416 ms

sliders.js

sliders.js

417 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

417 ms

common.js

common.js

422 ms

framework-settings.js

framework-settings.js

421 ms

api.js

api.js

69 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

422 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

501 ms

woocommerce-custom.js

woocommerce-custom.js

453 ms

index.js

index.js

449 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

436 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

434 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

414 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

513 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

499 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

484 ms

custom-scripts.js

custom-scripts.js

481 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

479 ms

map.png

map.png

426 ms

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1Euyyse0mj.ttf

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1Euyyse0mj.ttf

97 ms

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiSyse0mj.ttf

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiSyse0mj.ttf

97 ms

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiS2se0mj.ttf

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiS2se0mj.ttf

161 ms

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1Ebiuse0mj.ttf

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1Ebiuse0mj.ttf

209 ms

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EICuse0mj.ttf

NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EICuse0mj.ttf

210 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

304 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

259 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

156 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

153 ms

Accessibility Review

resscott.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

resscott.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

resscott.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resscott.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resscott.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

resscott.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RESSCOTT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: