Tools & Wizards About Us
restoline.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

restoline.net

Restoline - Entreprise spécialisée dans les fournitures pour CHR

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

228 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

restoline.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Restoline content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about restoline.net

Entreprise spécialisée dans la vente en ligne de matériels de restauration pour les professionnels CHR (cafés, hôtels, restaurants), snacks, sandwicheries, traiteurs, loueurs, collectivités et grandes...

Visit restoline.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Restoline.net page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

restoline.net performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.294

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

restoline.net

228 ms

restoline.net

399 ms

www.restoline.net

641 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

101 ms

style.css

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Restoline.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Restoline.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 113.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Restoline.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 848.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 54.1 kB

  • Original 66.8 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 42.1 kB

  • Original 747.6 kB
  • After minification 705.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Restoline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 848.0 kB
  • After minification 847.0 kB
  • After compression 834.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 49.5 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB
  • After compression 45.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Restoline.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (49%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Restoline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

restoline.net

restoline.net

228 ms

restoline.net

restoline.net

399 ms

www.restoline.net

www.restoline.net

641 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

101 ms

style.css

style.css

199 ms

style.css

style.css

294 ms

slick.css

slick.css

310 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

320 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

420 ms

style.css

style.css

304 ms

logo-restoline.jpg

logo-restoline.jpg

298 ms

friteuse-2.jpg

friteuse-2.jpg

675 ms

slide-2.jpg

slide-2.jpg

777 ms

slide-1.jpg

slide-1.jpg

690 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

504 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

466 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

530 ms

script.js

script.js

530 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

604 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

614 ms

mixitup.min.js

mixitup.min.js

616 ms

script.js

script.js

703 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

716 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

723 ms

script.js

script.js

771 ms

tarteaucitron.js

tarteaucitron.js

787 ms

script.js

script.js

800 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

1409 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

818 ms

bootstrap-input-spinner.js

bootstrap-input-spinner.js

869 ms

main.js

main.js

870 ms

box_newsletter.js

box_newsletter.js

886 ms

fd2-424x424.jpg

fd2-424x424.jpg

897 ms

fd5-424x424.jpg

fd5-424x424.jpg

917 ms

kl4-424x424.jpg

kl4-424x424.jpg

968 ms

kd8-424x424.jpg

kd8-424x424.jpg

967 ms

fd8-424x424.jpg

fd8-424x424.jpg

985 ms

cp4-424x424.jpg

cp4-424x424.jpg

993 ms

fp2-424x424.jpg

fp2-424x424.jpg

1015 ms

trsy2v-424x424.jpg

trsy2v-424x424.jpg

979 ms

sacs-gauff-0-424x424.jpg

sacs-gauff-0-424x424.jpg

880 ms

glace-12k-0-424x424.jpg

glace-12k-0-424x424.jpg

802 ms

kl0-frites-424x424.jpg

kl0-frites-424x424.jpg

806 ms

ckp-01-0-424x424.jpg

ckp-01-0-424x424.jpg

818 ms

fx20-424x424.jpg

fx20-424x424.jpg

868 ms

txi-424x424.jpg

txi-424x424.jpg

858 ms

blade-g-424x424.jpg

blade-g-424x424.jpg

726 ms

cuisine-576.jpg

cuisine-576.jpg

734 ms

recaptcha__fr.js

recaptcha__fr.js

27 ms

logo-animaweb.svg

logo-animaweb.svg

692 ms

bg-commande.jpg

bg-commande.jpg

740 ms

bg-paiement.jpg

bg-paiement.jpg

734 ms

bg-livraison.jpg

bg-livraison.jpg

684 ms

bg-hat.png

bg-hat.png

682 ms

bg-stripes.png

bg-stripes.png

699 ms

bg-hat-2.png

bg-hat-2.png

698 ms

style.css

style.css

105 ms

tarteaucitron.fr.js

tarteaucitron.fr.js

104 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

101 ms

tarteaucitron.services.js

tarteaucitron.services.js

109 ms

Accessibility Review

restoline.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

restoline.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

restoline.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Restoline.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Restoline.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

restoline.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Restoline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: