2.5 sec in total
346 ms
1.7 sec
450 ms
Visit resultncutoff.in now to see the best up-to-date Resultncutoff content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about resultncutoff.in
Exam Result And Cutoff
Visit resultncutoff.inWe analyzed Resultncutoff.in page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
resultncutoff.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value190 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.199
62/100
15%
Value3.6 s
92/100
10%
346 ms
223 ms
148 ms
151 ms
366 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Resultncutoff.in, 9% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (552 ms) relates to the external source Apis.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 558.9 kB (63%)
886.2 kB
327.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Resultncutoff.in main page is 886.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 645.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Resultncutoff needs image optimization as it can save up to 105.9 kB or 93% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 354.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 354.1 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resultncutoff.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (62%)
65
25
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resultncutoff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
resultncutoff.in
346 ms
wpdiscuz.min.css
223 ms
validator.min.css
148 ms
tooltipster.min.css
151 ms
jquery.js
366 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
151 ms
html5.min.js
223 ms
validator.min.js
226 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
226 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
293 ms
jquery.autogrowtextarea.min.js
293 ms
wpdiscuz.min.js
293 ms
style.css
388 ms
css
66 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
jquery.min.js
80 ms
main.js
165 ms
widgets.js
8 ms
plusone.js
63 ms
all.js
36 ms
infolinks_main.js
79 ms
analytics.js
51 ms
logo.png
301 ms
icons.png
306 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
265 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf
341 ms
ca-pub-7073479284913556.js
259 ms
zrt_lookup.html
252 ms
show_ads_impl.js
140 ms
collect
200 ms
sdk.js
202 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
347 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
380 ms
fastbutton
552 ms
user_sync.html
213 ms
usersyncup-an.html
138 ms
ice.js
369 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
302 ms
465 ms
ads
447 ms
449 ms
xd_arbiter.php
137 ms
xd_arbiter.php
271 ms
ping
497 ms
osd.js
146 ms
showad.js
161 ms
PugMaster
49 ms
pixel
245 ms
Pug
130 ms
usersync.aspx
130 ms
postmessageRelay
205 ms
Pug
79 ms
like.php
145 ms
Pug
70 ms
generic
52 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
84 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
56 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
58 ms
Pug
63 ms
like.php
135 ms
Pug
57 ms
generic
34 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
52 ms
api.js
75 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
117 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
106 ms
pixel
72 ms
Pug
74 ms
rU2ubZ6l1Q5.js
113 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
102 ms
Pug
29 ms
pixel
13 ms
jot
95 ms
like.php
96 ms
resultncutoff.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
resultncutoff.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
resultncutoff.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultncutoff.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Resultncutoff.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
resultncutoff.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Resultncutoff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: