Tools & Wizards About Us
resultsbase.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

resultsbase.net

Results Base

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

223 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

344 ms

resultsbase.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Results Base content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about resultsbase.net

Results Base are the leading timing company in the UK providing solutions for over 500 physical, virtual and self-timed events a year

Visit resultsbase.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Resultsbase.net page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

resultsbase.net performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

resultsbase.net

223 ms

home.aspx

669 ms

CommonStyles.css

166 ms

dark.css

169 ms

layout.css

175 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Resultsbase.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (669 ms) belongs to the original domain Resultsbase.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (75%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

447.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Resultsbase.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 696.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 611.1 kB

  • Original 665.5 kB
  • After minification 655.8 kB
  • After compression 54.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 611.1 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 46.7 kB

  • Original 325.3 kB
  • After minification 278.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Results Base needs image optimization as it can save up to 46.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 592.7 kB

  • Original 696.0 kB
  • After minification 499.8 kB
  • After compression 103.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 592.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 64.0 kB

  • Original 75.4 kB
  • After minification 55.0 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resultsbase.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (44%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Results Base. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

resultsbase.net

resultsbase.net

223 ms

home.aspx

home.aspx

669 ms

CommonStyles.css

CommonStyles.css

166 ms

dark.css

dark.css

169 ms

layout.css

layout.css

175 ms

default.css

default.css

174 ms

style.css

style.css

177 ms

racesignup.css

racesignup.css

250 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

RaceSignup.js

RaceSignup.js

406 ms

RTS.js

RTS.js

261 ms

RaceSignup_Events.js

RaceSignup_Events.js

261 ms

PostScript.css

PostScript.css

261 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

258 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

462 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

345 ms

Webkit.js

Webkit.js

272 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

82 ms

twitter24.png

twitter24.png

89 ms

facebook24.png

facebook24.png

88 ms

canarywharf.jpg

canarywharf.jpg

471 ms

velocity.jpg

velocity.jpg

262 ms

WinterRun.jpg

WinterRun.jpg

262 ms

samll_national_relays_syart.jpg

samll_national_relays_syart.jpg

262 ms

vitruvian.jpg

vitruvian.jpg

231 ms

pause_red_small.jpg

pause_red_small.jpg

232 ms

payment-types_sm.png

payment-types_sm.png

262 ms

header.png

header.png

95 ms

bar-bg.jpg

bar-bg.jpg

96 ms

section-bg.jpg

section-bg.jpg

263 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

13 ms

icon_top.png

icon_top.png

83 ms

collect

collect

2 ms

collect

collect

57 ms

Accessibility Review

resultsbase.net accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

resultsbase.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

resultsbase.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultsbase.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Resultsbase.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

resultsbase.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Results Base. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: