Tools & Wizards About Us
resultsbase.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

resultsbase.net

Results Base

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

284 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

907 ms

resultsbase.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Results Base content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about resultsbase.net

Results Base are the leading timing company in the UK providing solutions for over 500 physical, virtual and self-timed events a year

Visit resultsbase.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Resultsbase.net page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

resultsbase.net performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

resultsbase.net

284 ms

resultsbase.net

615 ms

css

141 ms

css

206 ms

css

225 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Resultsbase.net, 23% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (865 ms) relates to the external source Matomo.dev.sportstiming.dk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 215.2 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Resultsbase.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 90.8 kB

  • Original 110.9 kB
  • After minification 108.9 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 123.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Results Base needs image optimization as it can save up to 123.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 42 B

  • Original 41.7 kB
  • After minification 41.7 kB
  • After compression 41.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 22.3 kB
  • After minification 22.3 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resultsbase.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (45%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Results Base. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

resultsbase.net

resultsbase.net

284 ms

resultsbase.net

resultsbase.net

615 ms

css

css

141 ms

css

css

206 ms

css

css

225 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

141 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

89 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

203 ms

1

1

286 ms

2

2

402 ms

3

3

381 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

188 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

218 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

578 ms

iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js

iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js

189 ms

variant-resultsbase.css

variant-resultsbase.css

385 ms

bundle

bundle

651 ms

bundle

bundle

753 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

865 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

117 ms

MainBanner_Swimmer.jpg

MainBanner_Swimmer.jpg

555 ms

MainBanner_Reflection.jpg

MainBanner_Reflection.jpg

551 ms

MainBanner_Medals.jpg

MainBanner_Medals.jpg

620 ms

MainBanner_FramedVans.jpg

MainBanner_FramedVans.jpg

754 ms

MainBanner_CattleCreep.jpg

MainBanner_CattleCreep.jpg

757 ms

visa-22.gif

visa-22.gif

248 ms

master_22.gif

master_22.gif

428 ms

maestro_22.gif

maestro_22.gif

550 ms

jcb.png

jcb.png

614 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

321 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

423 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

420 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

415 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

415 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

298 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

401 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

412 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

408 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

407 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

408 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

404 ms

ico_bike_256.png

ico_bike_256.png

449 ms

ico_run_256.png

ico_run_256.png

449 ms

ico_bike_cross_256.png

ico_bike_cross_256.png

566 ms

ico_trailrun_256.png

ico_trailrun_256.png

568 ms

ico_swim_256.png

ico_swim_256.png

566 ms

ico_triathlon_256.png

ico_triathlon_256.png

486 ms

Accessibility Review

resultsbase.net accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

resultsbase.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

resultsbase.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultsbase.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resultsbase.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

resultsbase.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Results Base. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: