Tools & Wizards About Us
resultsdepartment.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

resultsdepartment.com

Copywriter in Oxfordshire | Proofreading | Maximising Your Message

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

681 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

487 ms

resultsdepartment.com screenshot

About Website

Visit resultsdepartment.com now to see the best up-to-date Resultsdepartment content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about resultsdepartment.com

Results Department is an Oxfordshire-based copywriter providing copywriting & editorial services. We’ll maximise your message, whatever the audience.

Visit resultsdepartment.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Resultsdepartment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 681 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

resultsdepartment.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

resultsdepartment.com

681 ms

js

77 ms

js_composer.min.css

251 ms

style.css

545 ms

css2

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Resultsdepartment.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Resultsdepartment.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.9 kB (12%)

Content Size

663.0 kB

After Optimization

582.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Resultsdepartment.com main page is 663.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 584.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 78.3 kB
  • After minification 77.5 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 584.7 kB
  • After minification 567.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resultsdepartment images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (44%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resultsdepartment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

resultsdepartment.com

resultsdepartment.com

681 ms

js

js

77 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

251 ms

style.css

style.css

545 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

style.css

style.css

316 ms

wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-min.css

wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-min.css

326 ms

wpbakery.css

wpbakery.css

337 ms

ticons.min.css

ticons.min.css

322 ms

vcex-shortcodes.css

vcex-shortcodes.css

356 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

565 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

440 ms

css

css

43 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

436 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

461 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

466 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

671 ms

vc_material.min.css

vc_material.min.css

672 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

672 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

673 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

898 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

734 ms

sidr.min.js

sidr.min.js

734 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

787 ms

fancybox.min.js

fancybox.min.js

791 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

746 ms

vc_waypoints.min.js

vc_waypoints.min.js

823 ms

Untitled-design-12-4.png

Untitled-design-12-4.png

405 ms

proofreading-services.jpg

proofreading-services.jpg

280 ms

Screenshot-2024-01-03-125634.jpg

Screenshot-2024-01-03-125634.jpg

632 ms

copywriter-in-oxfordshire.png

copywriter-in-oxfordshire.png

395 ms

2k-tiger-logo-200.jpg

2k-tiger-logo-200.jpg

336 ms

ace-market-research.jpg

ace-market-research.jpg

393 ms

cabot-asset-finance.jpg

cabot-asset-finance.jpg

407 ms

huddle-furniture.jpg

huddle-furniture.jpg

480 ms

isma.jpg

isma.jpg

510 ms

jabuit.png

jabuit.png

537 ms

MakePublic-07-2017.png

MakePublic-07-2017.png

532 ms

Multiload.jpg

Multiload.jpg

535 ms

fs-legal-solicitors-llp.jpg

fs-legal-solicitors-llp.jpg

635 ms

tal.png

tal.png

644 ms

TVBA.jpg

TVBA.jpg

652 ms

un-oxford.png

un-oxford.png

666 ms

2k-Tiger-logo-growing-business-002-scaled.jpg

2k-Tiger-logo-growing-business-002-scaled.jpg

860 ms

Untitled-design-30.png

Untitled-design-30.png

766 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

768 ms

Blog-14-lands-end-1469496-640x480-100x75.jpg

Blog-14-lands-end-1469496-640x480-100x75.jpg

763 ms

Blog-13-Girls-using-telephones-credit-Melanie-Schwolert-on-Pixabay-100x66.jpg

Blog-13-Girls-using-telephones-credit-Melanie-Schwolert-on-Pixabay-100x66.jpg

774 ms

Blog-12-sunny-day-1363483-639x550-100x86.jpg

Blog-12-sunny-day-1363483-639x550-100x86.jpg

778 ms

Blog-11-park-waterfall-1480662-640x480-100x75.jpg

Blog-11-park-waterfall-1480662-640x480-100x75.jpg

882 ms

Blog-10-Close-up-book-1239789-639x426-100x67.jpg

Blog-10-Close-up-book-1239789-639x426-100x67.jpg

877 ms

procopywriters_logo_strapline-300x300.png

procopywriters_logo_strapline-300x300.png

873 ms

SME-News-2023-300x227.jpg

SME-News-2023-300x227.jpg

854 ms

IE-22-Winner-12-cropped.jpg

IE-22-Winner-12-cropped.jpg

907 ms

Global-300x275.png

Global-300x275.png

977 ms

ticons.woff

ticons.woff

964 ms

font

font

60 ms

font

font

63 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

977 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

936 ms

vc_material.ttf

vc_material.ttf

1061 ms

wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-max.css

wpex-mobile-menu-breakpoint-max.css

126 ms

Accessibility Review

resultsdepartment.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

resultsdepartment.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

resultsdepartment.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultsdepartment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resultsdepartment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

resultsdepartment.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Resultsdepartment. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: