5.2 sec in total
865 ms
3.6 sec
773 ms
Welcome to retag.in homepage info - get ready to check Re Tag best content right away, or after learning these important things about retag.in
Buy & sell 100% authentic preowned luxury handbags, 2nd hand bags, pre-loved women, men & kids clothing & accessories online. Get up to 80% off on retail prices.
Visit retag.inWe analyzed Retag.in page load time and found that the first response time was 865 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
retag.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value21.1 s
0/100
25%
Value36.5 s
0/100
10%
Value41,710 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.698
7/100
15%
Value66.4 s
0/100
10%
865 ms
1009 ms
736 ms
744 ms
512 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Retag.in, 22% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Retag.in.
Page size can be reduced by 262.7 kB (35%)
753.7 kB
491.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Retag.in main page is 753.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 417.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Tag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 122.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 122.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retag.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (63%)
16
6
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Tag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
retag.in
865 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1009 ms
font-awesome.min.css
736 ms
style.css
744 ms
default.css
512 ms
jquery-2.1.0.min.js
1298 ms
modernizr-2.8.0.min.js
785 ms
plugins.js
1519 ms
functions.js
980 ms
switcher.js
991 ms
jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js
1058 ms
retag_final.png
2724 ms
css
23 ms
css
35 ms
loading.gif
255 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
4 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
16 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
8 ms
fKnfV28XkldRW297cFLeqfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
20 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
987 ms
W4wDsBUluyw0tK3tykhXEfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
14 ms
page-top.jpg
256 ms
newsletter.jpg
266 ms
retag.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
retag.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
retag.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retag.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Retag.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
retag.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Re Tag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: