3 sec in total
829 ms
2 sec
226 ms
Visit retaggr.com now to see the best up-to-date Retaggr content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about retaggr.com
Find and meet new people, build meaningful connections, and expand your circle of friends.
Visit retaggr.comWe analyzed Retaggr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 829 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
retaggr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
829 ms
68 ms
51 ms
129 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Retaggr.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (917 ms) belongs to the original domain Retaggr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 868.4 kB (76%)
1.1 MB
280.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Retaggr.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 588.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Retaggr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 419.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 419.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 422.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retaggr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 422.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (88%)
40
5
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retaggr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
retaggr.com
829 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
68 ms
widget.css
51 ms
buddypress.css
129 ms
frontend-forms.css
101 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.1.custom.css
105 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
113 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
75 ms
dashicons.min.css
138 ms
rtmedia.min.css
145 ms
style.css
326 ms
css
29 ms
font-awesome.min.css
164 ms
style.css
142 ms
jetpack.css
192 ms
jquery.js
230 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
171 ms
login-with-ajax.js
171 ms
plupload.full.min.js
261 ms
confirm.min.js
198 ms
widget-members.min.js
189 ms
jquery-query.min.js
212 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
221 ms
jquery-scroll-to.min.js
227 ms
buddypress.min.js
258 ms
js
51 ms
frontend-form.js
253 ms
core.min.js
258 ms
datepicker.min.js
293 ms
handlers.min.js
286 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js
304 ms
upload.js
290 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
399 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
399 ms
rtmedia.min.js
405 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
407 ms
retaggr.com
917 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
RETAGGR1d.png
35 ms
retaggr-background101088.gif
296 ms
g.gif
94 ms
LWCjsQkB6EMdfHrEVqA1KaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
26 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzCkuG2tq91CwNPt4hF7Mg5Y.ttf
39 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
53 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
52 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
131 ms
retaggr.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
retaggr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
retaggr.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retaggr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retaggr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
retaggr.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Retaggr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: