Tools & Wizards About Us
retainingwallsatl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

retainingwallsatl.com

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

201 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

3.1 sec

retainingwallsatl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Retainingwallsatl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about retainingwallsatl.com

We are the best contractor of retaining wall repair and installation in Atlanta. We also construct & install all types of retaining walls like brick, stone, concrete & hybrid.

Visit retainingwallsatl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Retainingwallsatl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

retainingwallsatl.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,990 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

retainingwallsatl.com

201 ms

www.retainingwallsatl.com

223 ms

js

189 ms

sites.css

61 ms

fancybox.css

150 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Retainingwallsatl.com, 32% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (7 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Retainingwallsatl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.5 kB (1%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Retainingwallsatl.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 42.0 kB

  • Original 54.8 kB
  • After minification 53.9 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Retainingwallsatl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 230.0 kB
  • After minification 230.0 kB
  • After compression 220.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 165 B

  • Original 37.9 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB
  • After compression 37.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retainingwallsatl.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (54%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retainingwallsatl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

retainingwallsatl.com

retainingwallsatl.com

201 ms

www.retainingwallsatl.com

www.retainingwallsatl.com

223 ms

js

js

189 ms

sites.css

sites.css

61 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

150 ms

social-icons.css

social-icons.css

149 ms

main_style.css

main_style.css

145 ms

css

css

148 ms

css

css

180 ms

css

css

179 ms

css

css

178 ms

templateArtifacts.js

templateArtifacts.js

206 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

193 ms

stl.js

stl.js

123 ms

main.js

main.js

158 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

424 ms

custom.js

custom.js

423 ms

main-customer-accounts-site.js

main-customer-accounts-site.js

125 ms

632449640.jpg

632449640.jpg

864 ms

retaining5-orig_orig.jpg

retaining5-orig_orig.jpg

840 ms

retaining2-orig_orig.jpg

retaining2-orig_orig.jpg

696 ms

retaining1-orig_orig.jpg

retaining1-orig_orig.jpg

575 ms

retaining4-orig_orig.jpg

retaining4-orig_orig.jpg

1018 ms

retaining3-orig_orig.jpg

retaining3-orig_orig.jpg

695 ms

retaining7-orig_orig.jpg

retaining7-orig_orig.jpg

1156 ms

retaining6-orig_orig.jpg

retaining6-orig_orig.jpg

1168 ms

retaining8_orig.jpg

retaining8_orig.jpg

1381 ms

satisfaction_1.png

satisfaction_1.png

1277 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

93 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

40 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

41 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

230 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

232 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

228 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

230 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf

227 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf

235 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf

234 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf

233 ms

tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf

tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf

229 ms

tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwQ.ttf

tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwQ.ttf

234 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfo.ttf

235 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-v.ttf

235 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_FQfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_FQfo.ttf

240 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzc.ttf

239 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc0CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc0CsE.ttf

242 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic0CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic0CsE.ttf

239 ms

collect

collect

208 ms

generateMap.php

generateMap.php

185 ms

ga.js

ga.js

85 ms

snowday262.js

snowday262.js

83 ms

api.js

api.js

119 ms

586 ms

js

js

84 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

137 ms

gen_204

gen_204

23 ms

tp2

tp2

139 ms

Accessibility Review

retainingwallsatl.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

retainingwallsatl.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

retainingwallsatl.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retainingwallsatl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retainingwallsatl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

retainingwallsatl.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Retainingwallsatl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: