Tools & Wizards About Us
retalresidence.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

retalresidence.com

Retal Residence

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

357 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

433 ms

retalresidence.com screenshot

About Website

Visit retalresidence.com now to see the best up-to-date Retal Residence content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about retalresidence.com

Visit retalresidence.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Retalresidence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

retalresidence.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value108.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value48.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value960 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.184

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value108.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

retalresidence.com

357 ms

gutenberg-blocks.css

55 ms

styles.css

364 ms

magnific.css

61 ms

wp-matterport.css

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Retalresidence.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Retalresidence.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 429.9 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Retalresidence.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 881.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 96.9 kB

  • Original 115.2 kB
  • After minification 109.1 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 452.7 kB
  • After minification 451.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Retal Residence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 236.5 kB

  • Original 881.7 kB
  • After minification 881.6 kB
  • After compression 645.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 236.5 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 95.3 kB

  • Original 251.6 kB
  • After minification 250.9 kB
  • After compression 156.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retalresidence.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.3 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (88%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retal Residence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

retalresidence.com

retalresidence.com

357 ms

gutenberg-blocks.css

gutenberg-blocks.css

55 ms

styles.css

styles.css

364 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

61 ms

wp-matterport.css

wp-matterport.css

60 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

59 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

74 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

92 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

77 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

75 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

119 ms

global.css

global.css

100 ms

post-1906.css

post-1906.css

101 ms

post-2532.css

post-2532.css

103 ms

post-1351.css

post-1351.css

114 ms

style.css

style.css

132 ms

slick.css

slick.css

113 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

114 ms

css

css

34 ms

style.css

style.css

136 ms

css

css

50 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

136 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

136 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

139 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

148 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

169 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

152 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

155 ms

wp-matterport.js

wp-matterport.js

154 ms

css

css

17 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

121 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

122 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

127 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

124 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

138 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

144 ms

index.js

index.js

385 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

166 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

193 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

158 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

162 ms

main.js

main.js

175 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

180 ms

search-popup.js

search-popup.js

182 ms

nav-mobile.js

nav-mobile.js

178 ms

login.js

login.js

183 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

184 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

173 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

173 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

173 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

177 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

178 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

182 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

180 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

169 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

181 ms

BluePattern_Fix.jpg

BluePattern_Fix.jpg

101 ms

cropped-retal-logo.png

cropped-retal-logo.png

42 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

42 ms

1

1

123 ms

embed

embed

292 ms

Photo-054.jpg

Photo-054.jpg

323 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

184 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

185 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYA.ttf

247 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYA.ttf

282 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYA.ttf

283 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf

285 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUhiYA.ttf

285 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUZiYA.ttf

286 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYA.ttf

286 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUhiYA.ttf

285 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf

285 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUhiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUhiYA.ttf

286 ms

skyview2-icon-2.0.0.woff

skyview2-icon-2.0.0.woff

106 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

246 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

106 ms

arial-unicode-ms-1.ttf

arial-unicode-ms-1.ttf

1450 ms

preview.min.css

preview.min.css

141 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

141 ms

loader.min.js

loader.min.js

141 ms

js

js

54 ms

ipanorama.min.css

ipanorama.min.css

51 ms

config.json

config.json

45 ms

search.js

search.js

3 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

16 ms

dark.min.css

dark.min.css

22 ms

civic.min.css

civic.min.css

23 ms

civic.min.js

civic.min.js

25 ms

fade.min.js

fade.min.js

21 ms

main.css

main.css

21 ms

three.min.js

three.min.js

64 ms

ipanorama.min.js

ipanorama.min.js

31 ms

jquery.ipanorama.min.js

jquery.ipanorama.min.js

24 ms

Accessibility Review

retalresidence.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

retalresidence.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

retalresidence.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retalresidence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retalresidence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

retalresidence.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Retal Residence. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: