Tools & Wizards About Us
retrocalendar.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

retrocalendar.com

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

697 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

195 ms

retrocalendar.com screenshot

About Website

Visit retrocalendar.com now to see the best up-to-date Retrocalendar content for Ireland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about retrocalendar.com

Beautiful Vintage Glamour Calendars. Click Image to Buy -  Nostalgic vintage style wall calendars, with beautiful imagery from the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s...

Visit retrocalendar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Retrocalendar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 697 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

retrocalendar.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

retrocalendar.com

697 ms

reset.css

131 ms

style.css

185 ms

55420d98e605a.css

214 ms

structure.css

147 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Retrocalendar.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (709 ms) belongs to the original domain Retrocalendar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 956.4 kB (32%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Retrocalendar.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 23.1 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 351.7 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Retrocalendar needs image optimization as it can save up to 351.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 276.6 kB

  • Original 413.9 kB
  • After minification 410.2 kB
  • After compression 137.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 276.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 309.8 kB

  • Original 364.7 kB
  • After minification 336.1 kB
  • After compression 55.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retrocalendar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 309.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (66%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retrocalendar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

retrocalendar.com

retrocalendar.com

697 ms

reset.css

reset.css

131 ms

style.css

style.css

185 ms

55420d98e605a.css

55420d98e605a.css

214 ms

structure.css

structure.css

147 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

228 ms

structure.css

structure.css

230 ms

style.css

style.css

231 ms

style.css

style.css

228 ms

nggallery.css

nggallery.css

353 ms

framework-min.css

framework-min.css

338 ms

shutter-reloaded.css

shutter-reloaded.css

329 ms

rounded-light.css

rounded-light.css

332 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

410 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

342 ms

jquery.cycle.lite.1.0.min.js

jquery.cycle.lite.1.0.min.js

597 ms

jquery.jj_ngg_shuffle.js

jquery.jj_ngg_shuffle.js

573 ms

shutter-reloaded.js

shutter-reloaded.js

437 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

595 ms

jquery.idTabs.min.js

jquery.idTabs.min.js

441 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

503 ms

jquery.fitvids-max-width-modification.js

jquery.fitvids-max-width-modification.js

522 ms

init-fitvids.js

init-fitvids.js

529 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

631 ms

css

css

24 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

413 ms

bg4.jpg

bg4.jpg

463 ms

1920s-calendar.png

1920s-calendar.png

466 ms

1920s-calendar2.png

1920s-calendar2.png

617 ms

1920s-calendar3.png

1920s-calendar3.png

465 ms

1930s-calendar.png

1930s-calendar.png

467 ms

1930s-calendar3.png

1930s-calendar3.png

466 ms

1930s-calendar4.png

1930s-calendar4.png

507 ms

1940s-calendar.png

1940s-calendar.png

709 ms

1940s-calendar2.png

1940s-calendar2.png

637 ms

1940s-calendar5.png

1940s-calendar5.png

638 ms

front-page-widget.jpg

front-page-widget.jpg

548 ms

buy-now-2016-150x150.jpg

buy-now-2016-150x150.jpg

579 ms

YDAoLskQQ5MOAgvHUQCcLbvy90DtE_Pg_qiF9bHvTzw.ttf

YDAoLskQQ5MOAgvHUQCcLbvy90DtE_Pg_qiF9bHvTzw.ttf

56 ms

We_iSDqttE3etzfdfhuPRX4NhRhUVU1NOvrEWRXSCoI.ttf

We_iSDqttE3etzfdfhuPRX4NhRhUVU1NOvrEWRXSCoI.ttf

55 ms

We_iSDqttE3etzfdfhuPRUgbSk09ekaEjkXjfj0Ujx8.ttf

We_iSDqttE3etzfdfhuPRUgbSk09ekaEjkXjfj0Ujx8.ttf

56 ms

M7uXhItuW68

M7uXhItuW68

84 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

25 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

45 ms

base.js

base.js

265 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

36 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

37 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

36 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

37 ms

style-mobile.css

style-mobile.css

84 ms

SEO Factors

retrocalendar.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retrocalendar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Retrocalendar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

retrocalendar.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Retrocalendar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: