Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 46

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

retrocollect.com

RetroCollect Video Game Database

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

597 ms

retrocollect.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to retrocollect.com homepage info - get ready to check Retro Collect best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about retrocollect.com

A Retro Gaming Collectors Community, offering Rarity Guides, Reviews and a place to share your games collection.

Visit retrocollect.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Retrocollect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

retrocollect.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.retrocollect.com

1672 ms

style.css

198 ms

style.css

200 ms

shadowbox.css

189 ms

styles.css

206 ms

Our browser made a total of 160 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (114 requests) were addressed to the original Retrocollect.com, 8% (12 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 4% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Adn.ebay.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 311.5 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

865.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Retrocollect.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 858.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 87.8 kB

  • Original 109.8 kB
  • After minification 108.3 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 78.3 kB

  • Original 858.2 kB
  • After minification 779.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Retro Collect images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 90.8 kB

  • Original 140.1 kB
  • After minification 140.1 kB
  • After compression 49.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.8 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 54.5 kB

  • Original 69.3 kB
  • After minification 58.2 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retrocollect.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (27%)

Requests Now

157

After Optimization

115

The browser has sent 157 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retro Collect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

retrocollect.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

retrocollect.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

retrocollect.com SEO score

46

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retrocollect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retrocollect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Retro Collect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: