Tools & Wizards About Us
retrospect.team screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

retrospect.team

Retrospect | Collaborate | Brainstorm | Kanban | Retrospect.team

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

159 ms

Resources Loaded

951 ms

Page Rendered

1 sec

retrospect.team screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Retrospect content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about retrospect.team

Easily conduct end of sprint and project retrospectives with everyone on your team no matter their location.

Visit retrospect.team

Key Findings

We analyzed Retrospect.team page load time and found that the first response time was 159 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

retrospect.team performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

retrospect.team

159 ms

css

57 ms

css2

72 ms

9d48f29a01.js

77 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Retrospect.team, 10% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (431 ms) belongs to the original domain Retrospect.team.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 217.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Retrospect.team main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 25.4 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 155.1 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Retrospect images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 135.1 kB
  • After minification 135.1 kB
  • After compression 119.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 55.8 kB
  • After minification 55.8 kB
  • After compression 37.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Retrospect.team needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (39%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Retrospect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

retrospect.team

retrospect.team

159 ms

css

css

57 ms

css2

css2

72 ms

9d48f29a01.js

9d48f29a01.js

77 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

64 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

94 ms

aos.css

aos.css

48 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

128 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

189 ms

site.css

site.css

173 ms

all.css

all.css

55 ms

js

js

91 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

72 ms

loading.css

loading.css

171 ms

sunshine-widget.min.js

sunshine-widget.min.js

338 ms

aos.js

aos.js

58 ms

create-board.min.js

create-board.min.js

183 ms

photo-1512229146678-994d3f1e31bf

photo-1512229146678-994d3f1e31bf

105 ms

Retrospect_logo.svg

Retrospect_logo.svg

90 ms

Retrospect_Board.jpg

Retrospect_Board.jpg

314 ms

Sarah_headshot.png

Sarah_headshot.png

320 ms

Bentley.jpg

Bentley.jpg

144 ms

Bloomberg.png

Bloomberg.png

131 ms

Chevron.png

Chevron.png

157 ms

Coinbase.png

Coinbase.png

151 ms

Disney_Streaming.png

Disney_Streaming.png

266 ms

Mastercard.png

Mastercard.png

223 ms

MentorMate.png

MentorMate.png

202 ms

Penske.png

Penske.png

208 ms

Thomson_Reuters.png

Thomson_Reuters.png

232 ms

Verizon.png

Verizon.png

248 ms

Nike.jpg

Nike.jpg

278 ms

Shutterstock.png

Shutterstock.png

270 ms

Sandeep_Koorse.jpg

Sandeep_Koorse.jpg

431 ms

font

font

24 ms

font

font

25 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

14 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

25 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

26 ms

Accessibility Review

retrospect.team accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

retrospect.team best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

retrospect.team SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Retrospect.team can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Retrospect.team main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

retrospect.team

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Retrospect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: