4.8 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.9 sec
785 ms
Welcome to return-on-clicks.com homepage info - get ready to check Return On Clicks best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about return-on-clicks.com
Return On Clicks: eCommerce, Online Content Strategy
Visit return-on-clicks.comWe analyzed Return-on-clicks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
return-on-clicks.com performance score
1191 ms
150 ms
196 ms
202 ms
368 ms
Our browser made a total of 132 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Return-on-clicks.com, 14% (18 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 9% (12 requests) were made to O.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Return-on-clicks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 515.7 kB (12%)
4.4 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Return-on-clicks.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 198.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Return On Clicks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 203.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Return-on-clicks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (46%)
128
69
The browser has sent 128 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Return On Clicks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
return-on-clicks.com
1191 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
150 ms
style.css
196 ms
style.css
202 ms
jquery.js
368 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
199 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.11.custom.min.js
213 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
228 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
276 ms
jquery.slidemenu.js
288 ms
beacon.js
40 ms
in.js
35 ms
wp-embed.min.js
225 ms
ga.js
13 ms
zemified_e.png
345 ms
return-on-clicks-logo.jpg
499 ms
navi_bg.png
499 ms
date.png
499 ms
author.png
498 ms
comment.png
498 ms
BustinBlockchainBitcoinMyth.png
574 ms
Bitcoinchart29Nov2015-300x198.png
550 ms
button.png
549 ms
specificfeeds_follow.png
574 ms
AskJPMTwitterInvitation.png
709 ms
simple-smile.png
573 ms
AskJPMTwitterAnnulation1.png
764 ms
Groupon-Stock-2013-300x202.png
724 ms
CharlieBitMyFingerEvergreen2-300x232.jpg
753 ms
DigimarcPrint2Pin2.png
898 ms
LookingForVisibility-300x231.jpg
711 ms
HubSpot-Inbound-Marketing-Glossary-238x300.jpg
895 ms
rss.png
897 ms
twitter.png
904 ms
googleplus.png
896 ms
sidebar_bg.png
890 ms
category.png
956 ms
tag.png
955 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
widgets.js
13 ms
js
530 ms
js
506 ms
plusone.js
444 ms
sdk.js
493 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
288 ms
1f609.png
642 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
219 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
219 ms
share
267 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
332 ms
share
337 ms
share
354 ms
share
345 ms
share
337 ms
share
325 ms
share
310 ms
share
438 ms
share
432 ms
share
277 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
98 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
209 ms
fastbutton
207 ms
fastbutton
206 ms
fastbutton
203 ms
fastbutton
202 ms
fastbutton
230 ms
fastbutton
372 ms
fastbutton
368 ms
fastbutton
310 ms
fastbutton
331 ms
fastbutton
317 ms
scoop-widget-0.css
172 ms
scoop-widget.js
257 ms
255 ms
xd_arbiter.php
317 ms
xd_arbiter.php
431 ms
syndication
319 ms
308531528932147201
390 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
102 ms
rs=AGLTcCMZQMkD3nQb9neyXrDGlfp1IpCqrw
47 ms
postmessageRelay
175 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
129 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
77 ms
logo_new.png
132 ms
pJeswbKZO4XwVR0035gpgvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
119 ms
XWK5yCKVOdXHMexYKYvNL396MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
340 ms
wv
291 ms
wv
323 ms
WBA87bHxQKc9-SQ9PRwodX96MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
292 ms
Vb4Hk_Aeo1Q2vsSByG6_f396MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
182 ms
0OeUYG2ugJ0PvoAVaCOEUH96MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
276 ms
OncB845wjZD5zrV_Tzrnl396MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
276 ms
xZdAjLkGCL8nPcagd_hBA396MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
198 ms
713ZyWPEpjPyLEExzqx9Sn96MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
344 ms
1kOhGnliTn8_sM0ir2ZQwH96MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
372 ms
8zsAyBMy0U0J0k2slzamBH96MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
434 ms
DDjROTlGmGbVUnZbrdMti396MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
341 ms
T6fFNHPJL3N1gwxmrNMb9n96MkXN2Bo-CBIMTdOCamM=
456 ms
bg_header_new.png
104 ms
control_left.png
196 ms
control_right.png
197 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
26 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
31 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
proxy.jpg
115 ms
proxy.jpg
108 ms
proxy.jpg
42 ms
proxy.jpg
41 ms
proxy.jpg
43 ms
proxy.jpg
109 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
13 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
15 ms
jjxgK1hz_normal.jpg
138 ms
z8GQwj3c_normal.jpeg
166 ms
pierre_metivier_normal.jpg
205 ms
55e2446250b4500d48dd8c35c4dc09c4_normal.png
240 ms
NPaYFz7p_normal.jpg
255 ms
ZkNKs6RD_normal.jpeg
258 ms
sTX_kbHu_normal.jpeg
314 ms
4D3wCD22_normal.png
315 ms
XPDr3fmF_normal.jpeg
314 ms
CdleQkMWwAEYOaQ.jpg:small
315 ms
CdG2d83WIAIfbwf.jpg:small
314 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
35 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
61 ms
link_v1_e64f66f5650df987d97cc5f00c4cb5987f367028.svg
2 ms
proxy.jpg
24 ms
proxy.jpg
36 ms
proxy.jpg
5 ms
proxy.jpg
6 ms
proxy.jpg
4 ms
proxy.jpg
52 ms
return-on-clicks.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Return-on-clicks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Return-on-clicks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
return-on-clicks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Return On Clicks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: