Tools & Wizards About Us
returntocentermailbox.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

returntocentermailbox.com

Complete mailbox and post | Snow plow resistant mailbox post

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

947 ms

Page Rendered

148 ms

returntocentermailbox.com screenshot

About Website

Visit returntocentermailbox.com now to see the best up-to-date Returntocenter Mailbox content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about returntocentermailbox.com

Rotating mailbox design, easy installation, snowplow resistant, vandal resistant and will get out of the way when necessary and automatically return to the desired position.

Visit returntocentermailbox.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Returntocentermailbox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

returntocentermailbox.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,750 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.26

47/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

returntocentermailbox.com

54 ms

www.returntocentermailbox.com

54 ms

www.returntocentermailbox.com

175 ms

bootstrap.css

55 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Returntocentermailbox.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (270 ms) belongs to the original domain Returntocentermailbox.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.7 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

930.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Returntocentermailbox.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 640.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 15.8 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 26.7 kB

  • Original 640.4 kB
  • After minification 613.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Returntocenter Mailbox images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 40.5 kB

  • Original 269.4 kB
  • After minification 269.2 kB
  • After compression 228.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 92.7 kB
  • After minification 92.7 kB
  • After compression 83.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Returntocentermailbox.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (47%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Returntocenter Mailbox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

returntocentermailbox.com

returntocentermailbox.com

54 ms

www.returntocentermailbox.com

www.returntocentermailbox.com

54 ms

www.returntocentermailbox.com

www.returntocentermailbox.com

175 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

55 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

65 ms

layout.css

layout.css

69 ms

p7PM3scripts.js

p7PM3scripts.js

72 ms

p7PM3-01.css

p7PM3-01.css

71 ms

css

css

43 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

96 ms

scroll-top.js

scroll-top.js

78 ms

style.css

style.css

86 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

90 ms

script.js

script.js

94 ms

script.js

script.js

75 ms

ga.js

ga.js

18 ms

css

css

62 ms

rtc-logo.jpg

rtc-logo.jpg

92 ms

return-to-center-mailboxes.jpg

return-to-center-mailboxes.jpg

93 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

36 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

34 ms

TJKdJKxGE2A

TJKdJKxGE2A

95 ms

attractivemailboxdesign.jpg

attractivemailboxdesign.jpg

53 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

43 ms

easytoinstallmailbox.jpg

easytoinstallmailbox.jpg

89 ms

safemailbox.jpg

safemailbox.jpg

74 ms

vandalresistantmailbox.jpg

vandalresistantmailbox.jpg

72 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

30 ms

rotating-mailbox.gif

rotating-mailbox.gif

270 ms

readers-digest-mailbox.jpg

readers-digest-mailbox.jpg

66 ms

social-buttons.jpg

social-buttons.jpg

81 ms

usa.jpg

usa.jpg

89 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

109 ms

pause.png

pause.png

133 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

17 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

10 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

29 ms

base.js

base.js

55 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

139 ms

om_QuI9M6WDewyV11PDqwyZXtjss-zYzBgeHLXyLCgE.js

om_QuI9M6WDewyV11PDqwyZXtjss-zYzBgeHLXyLCgE.js

127 ms

embed.js

embed.js

46 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

6 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

15 ms

id

id

44 ms

Accessibility Review

returntocentermailbox.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

returntocentermailbox.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

returntocentermailbox.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Returntocentermailbox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Returntocentermailbox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

returntocentermailbox.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Returntocenter Mailbox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: