Tools & Wizards About Us
revcycle.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

revcycle.com

Optimize Your Revenue Cycle | RevCycle RCM Services & Collections

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

74 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

653 ms

revcycle.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to revcycle.com homepage info - get ready to check Rev Cycle best content right away, or after learning these important things about revcycle.com

Optimize your revenue cycle! We provide custom revenue cycle management solutions including healthcare debt collection, EBO services, medical billing, and MLOC.

Visit revcycle.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Revcycle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

revcycle.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

revcycle.com

74 ms

www.revcycle.com

613 ms

tribe-events-pro-mini-calendar-block.min.css

47 ms

dflip.min.css

71 ms

style.min.css

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Revcycle.com, 18% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (613 ms) belongs to the original domain Revcycle.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 228.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Revcycle.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 61.5 kB

  • Original 78.1 kB
  • After minification 75.2 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 157.2 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rev Cycle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 480.9 kB
  • After minification 480.9 kB
  • After compression 471.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 953 B

  • Original 129.8 kB
  • After minification 129.8 kB
  • After compression 128.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revcycle.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (78%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rev Cycle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

revcycle.com

revcycle.com

74 ms

www.revcycle.com

www.revcycle.com

613 ms

tribe-events-pro-mini-calendar-block.min.css

tribe-events-pro-mini-calendar-block.min.css

47 ms

dflip.min.css

dflip.min.css

71 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

76 ms

css

css

47 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

78 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

103 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

78 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

78 ms

style-static.min.css

style-static.min.css

137 ms

style.css

style.css

101 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

128 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

107 ms

ds-script.js

ds-script.js

107 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

123 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

127 ms

api.js

api.js

46 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

125 ms

all.css

all.css

46 ms

et-core-unified-tb-1812-94.min.css

et-core-unified-tb-1812-94.min.css

126 ms

et-core-unified-tb-1812-deferred-94.min.css

et-core-unified-tb-1812-deferred-94.min.css

222 ms

22332830.js

22332830.js

75 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

231 ms

dflip.min.js

dflip.min.js

264 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

225 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

226 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

227 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

226 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

227 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

227 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

263 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

263 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

264 ms

common.js

common.js

264 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

264 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

231 ms

revcycle-logo.png

revcycle-logo.png

201 ms

strong-woman.png

strong-woman.png

341 ms

revcycle-superheros.png

revcycle-superheros.png

340 ms

22332830.js

22332830.js

402 ms

banner.js

banner.js

345 ms

home-hero_newlogowithtagline.jpg

home-hero_newlogowithtagline.jpg

318 ms

mobile-hero.jpg

mobile-hero.jpg

214 ms

footer-2.png

footer-2.png

191 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

224 ms

Website-Certifications-P.png

Website-Certifications-P.png

320 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

173 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

189 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

189 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

189 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

190 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

188 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

131 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

172 ms

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDX-tmmoDgR.ttf

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDX-tmmoDgR.ttf

87 ms

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDXndmmoDgR.ttf

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDXndmmoDgR.ttf

102 ms

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDXw9mmoDgR.ttf

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDXw9mmoDgR.ttf

101 ms

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDXL96moDgR.ttf

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDXL96moDgR.ttf

101 ms

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDXHd6moDgR.ttf

BXR2vF3Pi-DLmxcpJB-qbNTyTMDXHd6moDgR.ttf

101 ms

Accessibility Review

revcycle.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

revcycle.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

revcycle.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revcycle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Revcycle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

revcycle.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rev Cycle. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: