Tools & Wizards About Us
revers.engineering screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

revers.engineering

Reverse Engineering - Bugs, hypervisors, and reverse engineering research

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

397 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

351 ms

revers.engineering screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Revers content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about revers.engineering

A research blog regarding topics of reverse engineering, hypervisor development, Windows internals, and other assorted security research.

Visit revers.engineering

Key Findings

We analyzed Revers.engineering page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

revers.engineering performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.187

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

revers.engineering

397 ms

style.min.css

82 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

163 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

220 ms

styles.css

225 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Revers.engineering, 4% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Revers.engineering main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 70.1 kB

  • Original 84.1 kB
  • After minification 75.6 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 563 B

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Revers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 211.5 kB
  • After minification 211.5 kB
  • After compression 187.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.3 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 109.0 kB

  • Original 263.5 kB
  • After minification 263.5 kB
  • After compression 154.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revers.engineering needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.0 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (87%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Revers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

revers.engineering

revers.engineering

397 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

82 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

163 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

220 ms

styles.css

styles.css

225 ms

default.css

default.css

233 ms

all.css

all.css

155 ms

enlighterjs.min.css

enlighterjs.min.css

234 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

322 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

247 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

294 ms

hamburgers.css

hamburgers.css

302 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

310 ms

ol-icons.css

ol-icons.css

312 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

328 ms

pickdate.css

pickdate.css

368 ms

selectize.css

selectize.css

379 ms

vendors-overrides.css

vendors-overrides.css

388 ms

remodal.css

remodal.css

392 ms

remodal-default-theme.css

remodal-default-theme.css

402 ms

style.css

style.css

648 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

194 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

516 ms

copyright_proof_live.js

copyright_proof_live.js

454 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

545 ms

image-cdn.js

image-cdn.js

469 ms

index.js

index.js

485 ms

index.js

index.js

530 ms

enlighterjs.min.js

enlighterjs.min.js

552 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

567 ms

debounce-resize.js

debounce-resize.js

589 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

607 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

623 ms

jquery.browserdetect.js

jquery.browserdetect.js

630 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

753 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

753 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

773 ms

jquery.owwwlab-video.js

jquery.owwwlab-video.js

772 ms

e-202403.js

e-202403.js

15 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

772 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

695 ms

picker.js

picker.js

616 ms

selectize.js

selectize.js

559 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

615 ms

typed.min.js

typed.min.js

603 ms

velocity.min.js

velocity.min.js

605 ms

verge.min.js

verge.min.js

593 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

550 ms

remodal.js

remodal.js

543 ms

custom.js

custom.js

601 ms

cropped-4461xa_vector_logo_cardinal_bird_digital_circuit_on_white_backg_00016a3e-86ff-43a5-aa60-449301902d27.png

cropped-4461xa_vector_logo_cardinal_bird_digital_circuit_on_white_backg_00016a3e-86ff-43a5-aa60-449301902d27.png

1729 ms

everlift.jpg

everlift.jpg

250 ms

ajkhoury.jpg

ajkhoury.jpg

306 ms

line-shadow.png

line-shadow.png

249 ms

IntelClear_Rg.ttf

IntelClear_Rg.ttf

405 ms

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpAy3FvQNTI.woff

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpAy3FvQNTI.woff

181 ms

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCp4y3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCp4y3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

214 ms

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCp8y3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCp8y3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

236 ms

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpMy3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpMy3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

236 ms

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpQy3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpQy3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

257 ms

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCp0y3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCp0y3FvQNTIQoQ.woff

287 ms

6aez4K2oVqwIvtU2Gb0Q13E.woff

6aez4K2oVqwIvtU2Gb0Q13E.woff

309 ms

6aez4K2oVqwIvts2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

6aez4K2oVqwIvts2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

310 ms

6aez4K2oVqwIvto2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

6aez4K2oVqwIvto2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

310 ms

6aez4K2oVqwIvtY2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

6aez4K2oVqwIvtY2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

331 ms

6aez4K2oVqwIvtE2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

6aez4K2oVqwIvtE2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

361 ms

6aez4K2oVqwIvtg2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

6aez4K2oVqwIvtg2Gb0Q13HqPA.woff

382 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

87 ms

ol-icon-set.ttf

ol-icon-set.ttf

471 ms

3d-abstract-sharp-eg-2560x1080-1.jpg

3d-abstract-sharp-eg-2560x1080-1.jpg

450 ms

Accessibility Review

revers.engineering accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

revers.engineering best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

revers.engineering SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revers.engineering can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Revers.engineering main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

revers.engineering

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Revers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: