1.7 sec in total
360 ms
1.1 sec
220 ms
Click here to check amazing Revfront content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about revfront.org
revfront.org is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, revfront.org has it all. We hope you find w...
Visit revfront.orgWe analyzed Revfront.org page load time and found that the first response time was 360 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
revfront.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value2.7 s
84/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.179
67/100
15%
Value1.5 s
100/100
10%
360 ms
9 ms
233 ms
113 ms
150 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Revfront.org, 24% (9 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 22% (8 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (360 ms) belongs to the original domain Revfront.org.
Page size can be reduced by 231.0 kB (58%)
399.2 kB
168.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Revfront.org main page is 399.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 316.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 550 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 264 B, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 550 B or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Revfront images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 225.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 225.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revfront.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (52%)
29
14
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Revfront. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
revfront.org
360 ms
revfrontorg.wordpress.com
9 ms
revfrontorg.wordpress.com
233 ms
113 ms
css
150 ms
css
160 ms
142 ms
global.css
142 ms
148 ms
style.css
109 ms
115 ms
form.js
139 ms
126 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
267 ms
w.js
141 ms
merriweather.css
38 ms
global-print.css
2 ms
body-bg.png
198 ms
darktexture.png
197 ms
cropped-topp1.png
264 ms
259 ms
header-bot-2x.png
143 ms
button-back.gif
171 ms
TypoSlabserif-Light-webfont.woff
169 ms
Genericons.svg
170 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
123 ms
Noticons.svg
189 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
123 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
186 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
162 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
205 ms
213 ms
108 ms
g.gif
93 ms
g.gif
92 ms
g.gif
91 ms
googleplus-sign-in.js
27 ms
revfront.org accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
revfront.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
revfront.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revfront.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Revfront.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
revfront.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Revfront. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: