2.9 sec in total
133 ms
2.4 sec
384 ms
Welcome to reviewcritic.org homepage info - get ready to check Review Critic best content right away, or after learning these important things about reviewcritic.org
Discover unbiased, in-depth reports on health supplements to enable you to make an educated consumer choice about which products to choose. | Review Critic
Visit reviewcritic.orgWe analyzed Reviewcritic.org page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
reviewcritic.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value7.4 s
28/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
133 ms
115 ms
18 ms
49 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewcritic.org, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewcritic.org.
Page size can be reduced by 685.0 kB (48%)
1.4 MB
751.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewcritic.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 674.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 578.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 578.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Review Critic needs image optimization as it can save up to 98.5 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewcritic.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (56%)
90
40
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Critic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewcritic.org
133 ms
www.reviewcritic.org
115 ms
font-awesome.min.css
18 ms
style.css
49 ms
blocks.style.build.css
43 ms
style.min.css
68 ms
styles.css
46 ms
slick.css
46 ms
css
46 ms
sfsi-style.css
43 ms
style.min.css
57 ms
style.css
59 ms
style.css
73 ms
animate.css
54 ms
customstyles.css.php
1206 ms
jquery.min.js
73 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
74 ms
tie.js
69 ms
prefixfree.min.js
80 ms
modernizr.min.js
80 ms
DMCABadgeHelper.min.js
44 ms
scripts.js
86 ms
slick.min.js
86 ms
core.min.js
85 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
91 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
91 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
96 ms
custom.js
100 ms
script.min.js
117 ms
bootstrap.min.js
107 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
108 ms
equalize.min.js
107 ms
main.min.js
119 ms
wp-embed.min.js
115 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
84 ms
font-awesome.css
38 ms
css
33 ms
css
24 ms
logomiddle.jpg
131 ms
dmca-badge-w150-5x1-06.png
27 ms
reviewcriticlogo.png
90 ms
GoodSense-Migraine-Formula-Review.jpg
33 ms
Kate-Ryan-Skincare-Vitamin-C-Night-Repair-Serum-Review.jpg
116 ms
Cerebral-Success-SmartX-Review.jpg
117 ms
Nature%E2%80%99s-Wellness-Digestive-Enzymes.jpg
116 ms
Mederma-Advanced-Scar-Gel-Review.png
117 ms
Raspberry-Ketone-Premium-Review.jpg
92 ms
MRI-No2-Red-Extreme-Review.jpg
127 ms
Eva-Naturals-Skin-Lightening-Cream-Review.jpg
127 ms
Puritan%E2%80%99s-Pride-Raspberry-Ketones-Review.jpg
126 ms
Story-Skin-Care-Day-Serum-Review.jpg
127 ms
BestVite-Coleus-Forskohlii-Review.jpg
127 ms
Research-Verified-Keto.png
128 ms
Omega-III-Maxx-Review.jpg
143 ms
fungavir395-150x150.jpg
141 ms
Christian-Wildes-Enhanced-Turmeric-Formula-Review-150x150.jpg
143 ms
ZetaClear-Nail-Fungus-Treatment-Review-150x150.jpg
422 ms
Best-Naturals-Forskolin-Review-150x150.jpg
143 ms
Forskolin-Fuel-Review-150x150.jpg
142 ms
Forces-of-Nature-Nail-Fungus-Control-Review-150x150.jpg
144 ms
Lipowheat-Phytoceramides-Nutri-Vida-150x150.jpg
421 ms
Gaia-Herbs-Sleep-And-Relax-Review-150x150.jpg
421 ms
Jarrow-Formulas-Curcumin-95-Review-150x150.jpg
144 ms
Phytoceramides-Healthy-Life-Brand-Review-150x150.jpg
421 ms
Turmeric-Premium-Review-150x150.png
373 ms
ResearchVerified-Turmeric-Curcumin-Review-150x150.png
419 ms
ResearchVerifieds-Phytoceramides-Review-150x150.jpg
439 ms
310-150x150.png
459 ms
turmeric-150x150.jpg
459 ms
Emuaid-First-Aid-Ointment-Review-150x150.jpg
539 ms
Arjuna-BCM-95-Bio-Curcumin-Review-150x150.jpg
569 ms
Passion-Flower-Extract-Review-150x150.jpg
458 ms
NailRenew-Review-150x150.jpg
538 ms
NonyX-Nail-Gel-Review-150x150.jpg
792 ms
font-awesome.min.css
483 ms
style.css
459 ms
css
87 ms
analytics.js
125 ms
blocks.style.build.css
436 ms
style.min.css
451 ms
styles.css
456 ms
slick.css
470 ms
sfsi-style.css
492 ms
style.min.css
526 ms
style.css
593 ms
style.css
546 ms
animate.css
639 ms
stars-small.png
668 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
27 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
28 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
291 ms
EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf
310 ms
EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy4.ttf
310 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
27 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
666 ms
EJRTQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFT_r21dw.ttf
309 ms
EJRQQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFT9gaQZynfpQ.ttf
311 ms
collect
281 ms
sdk.js
294 ms
js
293 ms
sdk.js
63 ms
reviewcritic.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
reviewcritic.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
reviewcritic.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewcritic.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviewcritic.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewcritic.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Critic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: