Tools & Wizards About Us
reviewfinder.ph screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

reviewfinder.ph

Review Finder Philippines - ChatBot for Product Research

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

927 ms

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

reviewfinder.ph screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reviewfinder.ph homepage info - get ready to check Review Finder best content right away, or after learning these important things about reviewfinder.ph

Ask anything about the product you're shopping for. ReviewFinder will analyze expert reviews and answer in seconds.

Visit reviewfinder.ph

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviewfinder.ph page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviewfinder.ph performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reviewfinder.ph

63 ms

reviewfinder.ph

193 ms

css2

35 ms

zeoa11blmekojtbywi6e.jpg

137 ms

7927dfc2ea3263d16d307ecbb5f443c5.js

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewfinder.ph, 76% (26 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (664 ms) relates to the external source Res.cloudinary.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 271.1 kB (29%)

Content Size

927.0 kB

After Optimization

655.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Reviewfinder.ph main page is 927.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 637.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 241.3 kB

  • Original 289.2 kB
  • After minification 289.0 kB
  • After compression 47.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 241.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 637.8 kB
  • After minification 608.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Finder images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Finder. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

reviewfinder.ph

reviewfinder.ph

63 ms

reviewfinder.ph

reviewfinder.ph

193 ms

css2

css2

35 ms

zeoa11blmekojtbywi6e.jpg

zeoa11blmekojtbywi6e.jpg

137 ms

7927dfc2ea3263d16d307ecbb5f443c5.js

7927dfc2ea3263d16d307ecbb5f443c5.js

60 ms

logo-searchbox.png

logo-searchbox.png

86 ms

review-bars-180.png

review-bars-180.png

182 ms

vvt38nykda0lxtycuko5.jpg

vvt38nykda0lxtycuko5.jpg

254 ms

ocvjam1leqy0suwlsow6.jpg

ocvjam1leqy0suwlsow6.jpg

237 ms

yxmjktj4pmqy9mshqx9c.jpg

yxmjktj4pmqy9mshqx9c.jpg

258 ms

nq6kak6prvb2evobbsma.jpg

nq6kak6prvb2evobbsma.jpg

165 ms

m4qscv126vigkgfgog9a.jpg

m4qscv126vigkgfgog9a.jpg

260 ms

btfvtmvx9zi55vdirrig.jpg

btfvtmvx9zi55vdirrig.jpg

221 ms

xeesfnkigcmarvvx1orx.jpg

xeesfnkigcmarvvx1orx.jpg

266 ms

gfumcr3vbnz4i5u0t6yu.jpg

gfumcr3vbnz4i5u0t6yu.jpg

333 ms

aqoxwddyarnlod0kvrxt.jpg

aqoxwddyarnlod0kvrxt.jpg

363 ms

ouombivwidsrzgq1jten.jpg

ouombivwidsrzgq1jten.jpg

380 ms

dyytoie12iac695wpbqe.jpg

dyytoie12iac695wpbqe.jpg

453 ms

z2cibvx0slm4ieoq9wjg.jpg

z2cibvx0slm4ieoq9wjg.jpg

505 ms

jgynnnkdlsc7zv3vtm6y.jpg

jgynnnkdlsc7zv3vtm6y.jpg

396 ms

qiizukarm8qw4tfymsmu.jpg

qiizukarm8qw4tfymsmu.jpg

426 ms

tln8whcohlpjl1tlilgm.jpg

tln8whcohlpjl1tlilgm.jpg

501 ms

i8hnhb7jdkxgrzohuy3b.jpg

i8hnhb7jdkxgrzohuy3b.jpg

446 ms

smzh6jwalqvrs46s40pl.jpg

smzh6jwalqvrs46s40pl.jpg

519 ms

zimc6enjk1mcoybnhcx3.jpg

zimc6enjk1mcoybnhcx3.jpg

514 ms

outc3dxlxqvr3xpegttf.jpg

outc3dxlxqvr3xpegttf.jpg

532 ms

vkn6ginwdjtxswveynqv.jpg

vkn6ginwdjtxswveynqv.jpg

521 ms

fqema5wuotyxbu3wurcn.jpg

fqema5wuotyxbu3wurcn.jpg

596 ms

documents_hoibwr.svg

documents_hoibwr.svg

543 ms

struck.svg

struck.svg

664 ms

facepalm.svg

facepalm.svg

547 ms

rf-logo-3_1-slogan-white-blue_zdvvdp.png

rf-logo-3_1-slogan-white-blue_zdvvdp.png

553 ms

rf-logo-searchbox-white-400-28.png

rf-logo-searchbox-white-400-28.png

68 ms

5f93f983524def3dca464469d2cf9f3e.css

5f93f983524def3dca464469d2cf9f3e.css

35 ms

Accessibility Review

reviewfinder.ph accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

reviewfinder.ph best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reviewfinder.ph SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewfinder.ph can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewfinder.ph main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reviewfinder.ph

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Finder. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: