2.9 sec in total
137 ms
2.4 sec
315 ms
Welcome to reviewfindly.com homepage info - get ready to check Review Findly best content right away, or after learning these important things about reviewfindly.com
ReviewFindly is providing the best possible comparisons of various products in the market. ReviewFindly always try to interact with.
Visit reviewfindly.comWe analyzed Reviewfindly.com page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
reviewfindly.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.281
43/100
15%
Value3.6 s
91/100
10%
137 ms
359 ms
76 ms
205 ms
212 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewfindly.com, 31% (10 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewfindly.com.
Page size can be reduced by 34.2 kB (5%)
648.0 kB
613.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewfindly.com main page is 648.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 600.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Findly images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (59%)
29
12
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Findly. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewfindly.com
137 ms
reviewfindly.com
359 ms
autoptimize_single_3768683e0aaa0c1d2481c16d327bd33f.php
76 ms
style.min.css
205 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
212 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
213 ms
dashicons.min.css
329 ms
front.min.css
208 ms
jquery.min.js
330 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
263 ms
autoptimize_single_73b427d946675da97b6a7d132c15605c.php
266 ms
autoptimize_single_0462a7d31a66430fa2309d7cabbdad63.php
274 ms
reviewfindly.com
1503 ms
Do-children-have-enough-space-for-physical-activity-min.jpg
440 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
314 ms
superfish.min.js
318 ms
superfish.args.min.js
324 ms
skip-links.min.js
369 ms
front.min.js
370 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
372 ms
jquery.localScroll.min.js
372 ms
e-202410.js
29 ms
What-Is-The-Difference-Between-RC-helicopter-And-video-gaming-playing-min-1.jpg
557 ms
Best-Remote-Control-Dragon-min.jpg
750 ms
Best-Cheap-Remote-Control-Helicopters-min.jpg
654 ms
Best-Remote-Control-Robot-Dog-min.jpg
553 ms
Best-Remote-Control-Dinosaur.jpg
721 ms
Best-RC-Vehicles-for-Kids.jpg
887 ms
Best-Remote-Control-Bumper-Cars.jpg
555 ms
Best-Speed-RC-Car.jpg
1328 ms
Review-Findly-logo-1.png
430 ms
wARDj0u
3 ms
reviewfindly.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
reviewfindly.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reviewfindly.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewfindly.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewfindly.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewfindly.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Findly. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: