7.7 sec in total
1.2 sec
6.2 sec
280 ms
Click here to check amazing Review On content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reviewon.com
Review On Brings you the latest top unbiased product and information reviews and ratings on the latest trends, health, travel, along with user reviews and more.
Visit reviewon.comWe analyzed Reviewon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
reviewon.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value3.6 s
62/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.052
99/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
1243 ms
103 ms
92 ms
97 ms
117 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewon.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to Google.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewon.com.
Page size can be reduced by 536.7 kB (42%)
1.3 MB
749.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewon.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 699.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review On images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 425.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 425.6 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewon.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (56%)
77
34
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review On. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewon.com
1243 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
103 ms
widget.css
92 ms
wp125.css
97 ms
arpw-frontend.css
117 ms
wp-paginate.css
95 ms
jquery.js
116 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
167 ms
buttons.js
8 ms
reset.css
220 ms
slideshow.css
176 ms
style.css
529 ms
Teknium
156 ms
jquery-1.2.6.js
1539 ms
jquery.cycle.js
1532 ms
slideshow.js
2528 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
2400 ms
4q65vvzntrCFJHDKFFCEDLIHEGK
15 ms
kq75c37w1-LOSQMTOOLNMUUOUTM
14 ms
22111p59y31NPSOXUPONPOWRWSVX
14 ms
image-2640722-10444280
15 ms
bg.png
970 ms
logo.png
299 ms
menuhover.gif
967 ms
header-bg.png
298 ms
slider-bg.png
294 ms
focus1.jpg
973 ms
focus2.jpg
974 ms
focus3.jpg
969 ms
focus4.jpg
975 ms
focus5.jpg
1044 ms
focus6.jpg
1038 ms
focus7.jpg
2385 ms
focus8.jpg
1973 ms
focus9.jpg
1970 ms
focus10.jpg
1973 ms
facebook-like-us.png
1968 ms
Reviews.jpg
1976 ms
internet-marketing-review.jpg
2049 ms
iphone-3g-s-apps_medium.jpg
2033 ms
10854137-1433437258824
288 ms
J
282 ms
10838479-1417809719356
285 ms
10444280-1424725785038
284 ms
ca-pub-0071472330605725.js
322 ms
zrt_lookup.html
316 ms
show_ads_impl.js
268 ms
button.png
2013 ms
footer-bg.png
2003 ms
cse.js
404 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
85 ms
1
53 ms
ads
196 ms
osd.js
6 ms
10882870-1451332939565
46 ms
getSegment.php
18 ms
checkOAuth.esi
6 ms
t.dhj
272 ms
jsapi
23 ms
default+en.css
3 ms
default.css
46 ms
default+en.I.js
12 ms
default.css
141 ms
5156237678353052339
72 ms
abg.js
91 ms
m_js_controller.js
100 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
147 ms
async-ads.js
64 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
55 ms
small-logo.png
25 ms
search_box_icon.png
25 ms
clear.gif
80 ms
nav_logo114.png
54 ms
s
29 ms
x_button_blue2.png
29 ms
t.dhj
30 ms
7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js
2 ms
cm
28 ms
11 ms
s-3271.xgi
10 ms
hbpix
32 ms
6 ms
xrefid.xgi
5 ms
pixel
24 ms
2981
22 ms
index.2d85e55d89f85ae69e4f2ca5ab9438b7.html
16 ms
buttons.ab966a004186897711de4a5ed256c924.css
15 ms
stcommon.2b05accc08f1ee42fe1983647ab923ea.js
4 ms
st.1188278743c14064d5e8ae56c8ada29c.js
6 ms
activeview
12 ms
reviewon.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
reviewon.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reviewon.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviewon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewon.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Review On. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: