8.2 sec in total
176 ms
7.7 sec
305 ms
Welcome to reviewonline.com homepage info - get ready to check Review Online best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about reviewonline.com
News, Sports, Jobs - The Review
Visit reviewonline.comWe analyzed Reviewonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
reviewonline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value16.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value2,620 ms
4/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value27.9 s
0/100
10%
176 ms
56 ms
82 ms
17 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 301 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewonline.com, 9% (28 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (18 requests) were made to Pixel.rubiconproject.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (801 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (58%)
2.3 MB
968.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewonline.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 262.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 262.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Online images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 192 (70%)
276
84
The browser has sent 276 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 98 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewonline.com
176 ms
_defaults.css
56 ms
_layout_v2.css
82 ms
google_service.js
17 ms
calendar2.js
27 ms
embed.js
82 ms
urchin.js
23 ms
google_ads.js
18 ms
bg.gif
31 ms
ads
58 ms
ona.gif
214 ms
rss.gif
31 ms
spacer.gif
30 ms
all_access_homepage.png
52 ms
602099_1.jpg
147 ms
icon_RSS.gif
71 ms
vid_embeded_2_1.jpg
70 ms
cal.gif
71 ms
EZToUse300x50.gif
88 ms
promo_100x50_facebook.jpg
81 ms
promo_100x50_twitter.jpg
84 ms
3.jpg
116 ms
1.jpg
85 ms
2.jpg
121 ms
shaleplay.jpg
282 ms
MAPIT.gif
236 ms
submit.jpg
175 ms
ads
233 ms
header.gif
76 ms
zt.1rx.io
22 ms
osd.js
26 ms
img
166 ms
ajtg.js
15 ms
img
173 ms
img
179 ms
img
211 ms
vj
18 ms
gpt.js
18 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
6 ms
ads
223 ms
container.html
10 ms
expansion_embed.js
39 ms
quant.js
21 ms
bgLeft.gif
57 ms
navTopCap.gif
56 ms
navTopBg.gif
56 ms
B9331932.127975430;dc_trk_aid=301033672;dc_trk_cid=68577292;ord=16627109;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=
55 ms
8644588200474164391
56 ms
abg.js
58 ms
m_js_controller.js
69 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
51 ms
bodyBg.gif
42 ms
cornerHeaderTLO.gif
42 ms
cornerHeaderTRO.gif
46 ms
ads
192 ms
pixel;r=974596303;a=p-59TntzuqummDw;labels=AdKarma;fpan=1;fpa=P0-44887534-1456780360125;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456780360125;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Freviewonline.com%2F;ogl=
29 ms
s
55 ms
redir.html
50 ms
x_button_blue2.png
26 ms
iframe.html
16 ms
css
59 ms
m_js_controller.js
21 ms
abg.js
20 ms
cornerBL.gif
29 ms
cornerBR.gif
30 ms
ads
186 ms
favicon
58 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
21 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
62 ms
favicon
53 ms
cornerHeaderTL.gif
33 ms
cornerHeaderTR.gif
33 ms
ads
37 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
replica_edition.cfm
35 ms
ads
40 ms
135 ms
newspaper_replica_logo.png
32 ms
ads
237 ms
29_The%20Review__A__1_10.jpg
124 ms
ajs.php
126 ms
lg.php
21 ms
ads
248 ms
match.aspx
18 ms
ajs.php
143 ms
lg.php
12 ms
match.aspx
21 ms
ads
216 ms
zt.1rx.io
177 ms
img
88 ms
vj
19 ms
img
80 ms
img
94 ms
img
148 ms
ads
235 ms
16361345334375656224
24 ms
tooltip_pointer_clear.gif
28 ms
cornerHeader_BB.gif
30 ms
ads
43 ms
11912819089851997250
13 ms
cornerB_BB.gif
34 ms
iframe.html
31 ms
ads
216 ms
Launcher.html
8 ms
embed.js
12 ms
callback=_nw2e.closures.c0
7 ms
getids
74 ms
Widget.js
24 ms
favicon
72 ms
p-573scDfDoUH6o.gif
15 ms
3
61 ms
ads
217 ms
NdnEmbed.css
9 ms
NdnEmbed2.css
6 ms
ndn_sliderSprite.png
77 ms
ap_logo_75x27.png
60 ms
32383573.jpg
58 ms
13402.js
14 ms
ndn_playButtonSprite50px.png
17 ms
sync
24 ms
beacon.js
12 ms
WDSy9G5kYXAAH0yK4AAAA
3 ms
ndn_icon.svg
11 ms
391318-15.js
115 ms
favicon
55 ms
ads
239 ms
6577a81d-74a8-4a60-8eb7-331904d10962
25 ms
js
80 ms
js
40 ms
pixel
23 ms
bounce
15 ms
pixel.gif
76 ms
sync
88 ms
favicon
46 ms
bgRight.gif
44 ms
ads
221 ms
emily.html
14 ms
img
117 ms
emily.html
16 ms
iframe
24 ms
img
62 ms
img
14 ms
likebox.php
405 ms
casaleJTag.js
9 ms
j
536 ms
activeview
87 ms
activeview
33 ms
tap.php
226 ms
jTuqQ-OPDr6.css
288 ms
n370yiaI2G6.css
356 ms
dbNRhrdsQao.css
424 ms
uzCGVqplqq-.css
490 ms
1-xIpmMldel.css
557 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
627 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
623 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
493 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
492 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
554 ms
rFmE1g6Dkoz.js
758 ms
7cm7D75Y0Sf.js
655 ms
C-h3nYPqETO.js
686 ms
oRoBXlHCpEy.js
623 ms
336JejShbZp.js
704 ms
sj-JwAJi4AH.js
790 ms
DKRU1bYTkTw.js
707 ms
ZNPAadQNc33.js
706 ms
W0OV23mIOyO.js
753 ms
36TdwhIHusi.js
789 ms
b_6HNn_J2BZ.js
801 ms
sync
11 ms
i.js
36 ms
fo.js
7 ms
fmr.js
100 ms
11406.js
3 ms
p.gif
15 ms
sync
11 ms
127894-2.js
184 ms
img
52 ms
pbw.js
7 ms
sd
28 ms
fo.js
4 ms
fm.js
202 ms
420850_379273598757608_1887023536_n.jpg
351 ms
1918592_114775168540787_3679876_n.jpg
411 ms
11694963_10203134522803617_8485212009772413932_n.jpg
479 ms
580389_121884064853478_5923683107011023803_n.jpg
547 ms
10665946_219012714936012_3615476959387236229_n.jpg
545 ms
12743504_542325825946157_6472579716311605471_n.jpg
547 ms
10354686_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_n.jpg
544 ms
12345564_10207381683033352_5900297638093990180_n.jpg
545 ms
12743641_237854609882474_4617424689802757440_n.jpg
547 ms
1937248_1133995213285439_1112578694402865075_n.jpg
677 ms
12805666_1133448910006736_970702658247704007_n.jpg
676 ms
12802730_1132889710062656_6770917816894837363_n.jpg
678 ms
12745583_1132308270120800_102088111683960860_n.jpg
677 ms
1780772_1131781413506819_2480850408570659206_n.jpg
678 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
102 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
100 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
102 ms
a-ZN6WoEOje.png
103 ms
sync
11 ms
pUFVdPjIRct.png
70 ms
127898-2.js
139 ms
fm.js
87 ms
ajs.php
62 ms
lg.php
16 ms
fo.js
7 ms
fm.js
93 ms
match.aspx
12 ms
sync
10 ms
127904-2.js
85 ms
fo.js
4 ms
fm.js
151 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
69 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
155 ms
emily.html
15 ms
rvt.html
59 ms
rvt.html
32 ms
pixel.htm
73 ms
fcs.js
54 ms
channels.js
51 ms
user_sync.html
84 ms
ddc.htm
29 ms
tap.php
294 ms
cms-2c-rubicon.html
83 ms
user_sync.html
76 ms
generic
16 ms
usermatchredir
43 ms
zedo
210 ms
zedo
34 ms
mapuid
40 ms
tap.php
35 ms
generic
31 ms
crum
135 ms
rc
63 ms
rubicon
40 ms
fcm.html
40 ms
check
38 ms
showad.js
125 ms
fcm.html
40 ms
fcm.html
41 ms
js
108 ms
ads
115 ms
pixel
99 ms
rubicon.ashx
144 ms
218 ms
ping_match.gif
57 ms
tap.php
93 ms
fcm.html
92 ms
tap.php
82 ms
tap.php
83 ms
tap.php
88 ms
fcm.html
80 ms
fcm.html
80 ms
rubicon
79 ms
rbcm
476 ms
rc
87 ms
ProfilesEngineServlet
85 ms
tap.php
83 ms
PugMaster
68 ms
fcm.html
48 ms
crum
52 ms
tap.php
48 ms
IL8HEYI5-12-GR9A
80 ms
tap.php
343 ms
tap.php
48 ms
pixel
48 ms
ProfilesEngineServlet
55 ms
tap.php
352 ms
tap.php
41 ms
tap.php
34 ms
Pug
58 ms
fo.js
52 ms
tap.php
40 ms
match-result
71 ms
rs
48 ms
Pug
44 ms
Pug
43 ms
tap.php
32 ms
Pug
40 ms
Pug
37 ms
Pug
32 ms
Pug
34 ms
Pug
35 ms
fm.js
169 ms
footerBg.gif
34 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
7949489.json
21 ms
embed-runner.js
78 ms
page_1_thumb_large.jpg
168 ms
quant.js
36 ms
tap.php
305 ms
document.xml
93 ms
page_1_thumb_large.jpg
125 ms
img
41 ms
Pug
15 ms
u.php
132 ms
img
18 ms
mapuser
13 ms
fcm.html
6 ms
tap.php
91 ms
reviewonline.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reviewonline.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviewonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewonline.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Review Online. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: