3.1 sec in total
848 ms
1.8 sec
391 ms
Click here to check amazing Reviewopedia content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reviewopedia.com
Read customer reviews and expert insights to easily understand if the product or service is right for you.
Visit reviewopedia.comWe analyzed Reviewopedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 848 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
reviewopedia.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.221
56/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
848 ms
256 ms
30 ms
253 ms
336 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewopedia.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (848 ms) belongs to the original domain Reviewopedia.com.
Page size can be reduced by 257.8 kB (23%)
1.1 MB
885.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewopedia.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 754.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.9 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviewopedia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 150.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 150.3 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewopedia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (28%)
60
43
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewopedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewopedia.com
848 ms
main.css
256 ms
mootools-yui-compressed.js
30 ms
mootools-more-1.4.0.1.js
253 ms
reviewopedia.js
336 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
adsbygoogle.js
3 ms
getthumbnail
152 ms
bg.png
108 ms
search_button.png
140 ms
review_pencil.png
140 ms
captcha
255 ms
spinner.gif
151 ms
logo.png
152 ms
82045f42f0ece192d17502ce0c77a53915258376.png
355 ms
f817920edca9ea5728cb2b965abaf879b7e5f252.png
252 ms
87ddbe40a5bf71a103ec8307f49a0182e907995c.png
253 ms
812474d865054d3d563f73016f3265c60e13ea66.png
414 ms
ecbc31fee056fcda6c8160fc19ec04f7a56da641.png
421 ms
4b69551f7c74ca757afbada18f0edb9834a16f37.png
402 ms
2efa23afa40ce6ec34763323578ba0ee61c8ecfb.png
407 ms
thumb_88x66_866992ee32877e0ed3f94d296d430cf451e9f7c3.jpg
352 ms
thumb_88x66_734bc558470e26d87efaecbec2645cd26781d621.jpg
420 ms
thumb_88x66_268e7620c03eb88dd6b2c164369a328bb156cb4b.jpg
417 ms
thumb_88x66_a3d28b3cea2951ba76506ebd1e3076c2629d5b76.jpg
482 ms
thumb_88x66_d38b1538bcb3e8fd832dc3c77eb560d4f0ee4d8c.jpg
481 ms
getthumbnail
220 ms
all.js
37 ms
fb_small.png
474 ms
bg2.png
465 ms
proximanova-light-webfont.woff
487 ms
proximanova-regular-webfont.woff
485 ms
ca-pub-5093736620824394.js
111 ms
zrt_lookup.html
107 ms
show_ads_impl.js
73 ms
category_menu.png
487 ms
category_menu_all_arrow.png
502 ms
content_bar_bg.png
503 ms
star_on.png
508 ms
star_off.png
524 ms
proximanovacond-light-webfont.woff
534 ms
204 ms
title_underline.png
509 ms
ga.js
48 ms
ads
190 ms
xd_arbiter.php
78 ms
xd_arbiter.php
111 ms
osd.js
40 ms
ads
293 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
15804572504444533398
47 ms
abg.js
47 ms
m_js_controller.js
60 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
40 ms
xd_arbiter.php
55 ms
s
19 ms
redir.html
47 ms
x_button_blue2.png
19 ms
iframe.html
22 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
16 ms
10280937174091832160
13 ms
reviewopedia.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
reviewopedia.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reviewopedia.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewopedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviewopedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewopedia.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviewopedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: