Tools & Wizards About Us
reviewopedia.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

reviewopedia.com

Reviewopedia: Experience the power of customer reviews

Page Load Speed

412 ms in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

382 ms

Page Rendered

1 ms

reviewopedia.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Reviewopedia content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reviewopedia.com

Read customer reviews and expert insights to easily understand if the product or service is right for you.

Visit reviewopedia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviewopedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 383 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviewopedia.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,550 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.223

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

31/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reviewopedia.com

29 ms

reviewopedia.com

46 ms

www.reviewopedia.com

180 ms

style.css

18 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewopedia.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (180 ms) belongs to the original domain Reviewopedia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 44.8 kB (38%)

Content Size

117.7 kB

After Optimization

72.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reviewopedia.com main page is 117.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 66.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 28.3 kB
  • After minification 27.6 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 22 B

  • Original 66.9 kB
  • After minification 66.9 kB
  • After compression 66.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-98%

Potential reduce by 22.1 kB

  • Original 22.5 kB
  • After minification 487 B
  • After compression 471 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewopedia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 98% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (50%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewopedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reviewopedia.com

reviewopedia.com

29 ms

reviewopedia.com

reviewopedia.com

46 ms

www.reviewopedia.com

www.reviewopedia.com

180 ms

style.css

style.css

18 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

16 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

29 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

110 ms

site.js

site.js

39 ms

rating.js

rating.js

35 ms

navbar.js

navbar.js

40 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

28 ms

home.js

home.js

39 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

js

js

56 ms

reviewopedia-logo.svg

reviewopedia-logo.svg

27 ms

search.svg

search.svg

32 ms

quote.svg

quote.svg

30 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilntA.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilntA.ttf

20 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5ntA.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5ntA.ttf

28 ms

Accessibility Review

reviewopedia.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

reviewopedia.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reviewopedia.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewopedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewopedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reviewopedia.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: