5.7 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.8 sec
474 ms
Visit reviewstable.com now to see the best up-to-date Reviewstable content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviewstable.com
Popular Search Terms:ReviewsTable com-ReviewsyoucanTrust!NULL
Visit reviewstable.comWe analyzed Reviewstable.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
reviewstable.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value2.3 s
94/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
1413 ms
24 ms
34 ms
182 ms
183 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewstable.com, 13% (11 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewstable.com.
Page size can be reduced by 946.2 kB (50%)
1.9 MB
930.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewstable.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 727.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.4 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviewstable images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 340.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 340.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 486.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewstable.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 486.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (55%)
71
32
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewstable. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.reviewstable.com
1413 ms
css
24 ms
css
34 ms
facebook-comments-hidewpcomments.css
182 ms
facebook-comments-widgets.css
183 ms
styles.css
170 ms
style.css
146 ms
plugins.css
284 ms
main.css
349 ms
media.css
241 ms
dashicons.min.css
344 ms
jquery.js
388 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
315 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
319 ms
bg.jpg
114 ms
32.png
113 ms
reviews-table.png
141 ms
ajax-search-nav.png
121 ms
nav-shadow.png
109 ms
my-shed-plans-elite.jpg
247 ms
article-marketing-robot-discount.jpg
266 ms
fat-burning-furnace-review-400x380.jpg
256 ms
fat-loss-factor-diet.jpg
283 ms
woodworking4home.jpg
214 ms
captcha-sniper.jpg
272 ms
magic-submitter-discount.png
562 ms
aquaponics-4-you.jpg
552 ms
fat-burning-furnace-review-90x60.jpg
331 ms
building-a-chicken-coop-review.png
346 ms
earth4energy-ebook-cover-241x300.jpg
413 ms
power4home-review.jpg
365 ms
home-made-energy.jpg
560 ms
fat-burning-furnace-review-274x173.jpg
412 ms
Fat-Loss-4-Idiots.jpg
446 ms
pregnancy-miracle-review.jpg
576 ms
fat-burning-furnace-review-180x120.jpg
561 ms
loader.png
531 ms
slider-caption.png
532 ms
nb-dots.png
605 ms
comment-reply.min.js
620 ms
jquery.form.min.js
610 ms
scripts.js
613 ms
plugins.min.js
602 ms
main.js
884 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
892 ms
wp-embed.min.js
893 ms
js_composer_front.js
892 ms
PeTTkHQKj5rUPVxkIGAoaw.ttf
35 ms
j7wx-rRiDuE-JcaZ1ilpKg.ttf
36 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
font-awesome.ttf
1337 ms
momizat.ttf
1334 ms
plusone.js
79 ms
enotype.ttf
1285 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
likebox.php
97 ms
brankic.ttf
1280 ms
collect
24 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
9 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
30 ms
page
275 ms
postmessageRelay
34 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
357 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
420 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
1137 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
1167 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
1166 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
1165 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
21 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
28 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
rs=AGLTcCPxxcsaEHPLIxgGb9au86GYFsrXHA
8 ms
photo.jpg
182 ms
rs=AGLTcCPeW_yxohM6d2vzOu9_v18SNdO9Aw
24 ms
rs=AGLTcCNyaaduUvqXSD4CReLtqUtlnUcqnQ
51 ms
rs=AGLTcCNyaaduUvqXSD4CReLtqUtlnUcqnQ
17 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
50 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
55 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
59 ms
rs=AGLTcCNyaaduUvqXSD4CReLtqUtlnUcqnQ
8 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
78 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
69 ms
reviewstable.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
reviewstable.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
reviewstable.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewstable.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewstable.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewstable.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reviewstable. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: