Tools & Wizards About Us
reviewstiger.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 34

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

reviewstiger.com

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

760 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

reviewstiger.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Reviewstiger content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reviewstiger.com

Visit reviewstiger.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviewstiger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 760 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviewstiger.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.203

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reviewstiger.com

760 ms

hm.js

1233 ms

tothemoon.php

1065 ms

code.js

212 ms

link.js

422 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Reviewstiger.com, 20% (2 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Reviewstiger.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source .

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 12.9 kB (6%)

Content Size

199.9 kB

After Optimization

187.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Reviewstiger.com main page is 199.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 197.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 814 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 57% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 197.3 kB
  • After minification 185.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviewstiger images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 179 B

  • Original 699 B
  • After minification 691 B
  • After compression 520 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179 B or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewstiger. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

reviewstiger.com

reviewstiger.com

760 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1233 ms

tothemoon.php

tothemoon.php

1065 ms

code.js

code.js

212 ms

link.js

link.js

422 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

310 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

1478 ms

kaiyun.png

kaiyun.png

641 ms

jy1.png

jy1.png

849 ms

ayx.png

ayx.png

670 ms

Accessibility Review

reviewstiger.com accessibility score

34

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reviewstiger.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

reviewstiger.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewstiger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Reviewstiger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reviewstiger.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviewstiger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: