Tools & Wizards About Us
reviewter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

reviewter.com

ReviewTER - Book Hotels Online, Write & Read Hotel Reviews

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

171 ms

reviewter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reviewter.com homepage info - get ready to check ReviewTER best content right away, or after learning these important things about reviewter.com

ReviewTer is an Online Reputation Software for Hotels allows managing the guest reviews & enhancing the guests experiences. Write & read hotel reviews to book the cheap hotels online.

Visit reviewter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviewter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviewter.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reviewter.com

162 ms

reviewter.com

286 ms

www.reviewter.com

959 ms

font-awesome.min.css

159 ms

calendar.css

241 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewter.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) belongs to the original domain Reviewter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 206.4 kB (30%)

Content Size

677.4 kB

After Optimization

471.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Reviewter.com main page is 677.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 222.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 182.3 kB

  • Original 202.1 kB
  • After minification 154.7 kB
  • After compression 19.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.5 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 182.3 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 816 B

  • Original 222.1 kB
  • After minification 221.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ReviewTER images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 183.9 kB
  • After minification 183.9 kB
  • After compression 176.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 69.3 kB
  • After minification 58.1 kB
  • After compression 53.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (81%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ReviewTER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reviewter.com

reviewter.com

162 ms

reviewter.com

reviewter.com

286 ms

www.reviewter.com

www.reviewter.com

959 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

159 ms

calendar.css

calendar.css

241 ms

css

css

32 ms

css2

css2

44 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

aos.css

aos.css

297 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

546 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

364 ms

boxicons.min.css

boxicons.min.css

374 ms

glightbox.min.css

glightbox.min.css

432 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

373 ms

style.css

style.css

477 ms

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

572 ms

bootstrap.min2.js

bootstrap.min2.js

480 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

22 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

23 ms

calendarv2.js

calendarv2.js

511 ms

purecounter.js

purecounter.js

468 ms

aos.js

aos.js

565 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

601 ms

glightbox.min.js

glightbox.min.js

603 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

651 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

666 ms

noframework.waypoints.js

noframework.waypoints.js

636 ms

validate.js

validate.js

653 ms

main.js

main.js

667 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

74 ms

logo.png

logo.png

191 ms

calClose.gif

calClose.gif

203 ms

captcha.asp

captcha.asp

274 ms

hero-bg.jpg

hero-bg.jpg

397 ms

wEO_EBrAnc9BLjLQAUkFUQ.ttf

wEO_EBrAnc9BLjLQAUkFUQ.ttf

35 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

16 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

147 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

60 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

112 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

114 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

114 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

112 ms

bootstrap-icons.woff

bootstrap-icons.woff

331 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

js

js

102 ms

resbg.png

resbg.png

89 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

87 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

91 ms

Accessibility Review

reviewter.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

reviewter.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reviewter.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviewter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reviewter.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ReviewTER. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: