1.3 sec in total
244 ms
889 ms
196 ms
Visit revivall.org now to see the best up-to-date RevivALL content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about revivall.org
RevivALL life coaching guidance counsel for those who have experienced adversity or those who are ready to expand of their goals, dreams, and visions
Visit revivall.orgWe analyzed Revivall.org page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
revivall.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value16,350 ms
0/100
30%
Value1.38
0/100
15%
Value39.4 s
0/100
10%
244 ms
74 ms
108 ms
71 ms
324 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Revivall.org, 25% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to D7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (352 ms) relates to the external source Media.line.me.
Page size can be reduced by 156.9 kB (36%)
433.8 kB
276.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Revivall.org main page is 433.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 235.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RevivALL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 91.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revivall.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (61%)
31
12
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RevivALL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
revivall.org
244 ms
style.css
74 ms
jquery-2.0.2.min.js
108 ms
js.js
71 ms
bookmark_button.js
324 ms
line-button.js
352 ms
in.js
8 ms
platform.js
56 ms
button-only@2x.png
319 ms
top_main_img.jpg
251 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
7 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
19 ms
fastbutton
66 ms
postmessageRelay
50 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
17 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
15 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
27 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
32 ms
205 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
18 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
29 ms
btn.js
50 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
62 ms
button
5 ms
button.css
44 ms
shared.js
44 ms
button.js
46 ms
pocket_button.png
6 ms
82x20.png
175 ms
reset.css
11 ms
entry-button.css
13 ms
bbtn-l_v3.png
5 ms
revivall.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
revivall.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
revivall.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revivall.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Revivall.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
revivall.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RevivALL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: