Tools & Wizards About Us
revjolt.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

revjolt.com

revJOLT.com - Give YOUR Revenue A JOLT! - revJOLT.com

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

191 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

315 ms

revjolt.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RevJOLT content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about revjolt.com

Leverage our vast network to generate quality,real-time leads from high-intent consumers to generate revenue for your business.

Visit revjolt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Revjolt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

revjolt.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

revjolt.com

191 ms

revjolt.com

384 ms

style.min.css

247 ms

styles.css

85 ms

email-subscribers-public.css

143 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Revjolt.com, 23% (11 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 21% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (823 ms) belongs to the original domain Revjolt.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 207.2 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

807.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Revjolt.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 667.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

  • Original 65.4 kB
  • After minification 60.8 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 153.8 kB

  • Original 667.8 kB
  • After minification 514.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RevJOLT needs image optimization as it can save up to 153.8 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 155.8 kB
  • After minification 155.3 kB
  • After compression 154.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 617 B

  • Original 125.8 kB
  • After minification 125.7 kB
  • After compression 125.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revjolt.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (71%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RevJOLT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

revjolt.com

revjolt.com

191 ms

revjolt.com

revjolt.com

384 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

247 ms

styles.css

styles.css

85 ms

email-subscribers-public.css

email-subscribers-public.css

143 ms

pasa-link-redirect-and-manager-public.css

pasa-link-redirect-and-manager-public.css

143 ms

wp-faq-public.css

wp-faq-public.css

143 ms

css

css

275 ms

style.css

style.css

191 ms

choices.min.css

choices.min.css

329 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

268 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

272 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

269 ms

pasa-link-redirect-and-manager-public.js

pasa-link-redirect-and-manager-public.js

405 ms

et-core-unified-17278248144613.min.css

et-core-unified-17278248144613.min.css

498 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

189 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

266 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

271 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

270 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

272 ms

index.js

index.js

469 ms

index.js

index.js

627 ms

email-subscribers-public.js

email-subscribers-public.js

626 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

733 ms

common.js

common.js

823 ms

e-202440.js

e-202440.js

255 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

256 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

254 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

256 ms

logo-200x48.png

logo-200x48.png

74 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

127 ms

Video-Still.png

Video-Still.png

689 ms

shutterstock_314848592-2048x1366-1-1568x1046-1.jpg

shutterstock_314848592-2048x1366-1-1568x1046-1.jpg

146 ms

images-8.jpg

images-8.jpg

153 ms

Pay-Per-Call-Important-Questions-Answered-Ringba.jpg

Pay-Per-Call-Important-Questions-Answered-Ringba.jpg

155 ms

images-9.jpg

images-9.jpg

153 ms

OIP-34.jpg

OIP-34.jpg

153 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

25 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

56 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

141 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

152 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

151 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

666 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

151 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf

141 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf

148 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

148 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exQ.ttf

151 ms

Accessibility Review

revjolt.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

revjolt.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

revjolt.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revjolt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Revjolt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

revjolt.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RevJOLT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: