7.1 sec in total
82 ms
6.7 sec
392 ms
Visit revl.com.au now to see the best up-to-date REVL content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about revl.com.au
Visit revl.com.auWe analyzed Revl.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
revl.com.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value13.2 s
0/100
25%
Value16.4 s
0/100
10%
Value4,290 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value38.0 s
0/100
10%
82 ms
713 ms
710 ms
20 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Revl.com.au, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) relates to the external source Revltraining.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (17%)
6.3 MB
5.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Revl.com.au main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 210.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 210.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 842.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, REVL needs image optimization as it can save up to 842.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 780 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Revl.com.au has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (71%)
86
25
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of REVL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
revltraining.com.au
82 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
713 ms
main.min.css
710 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
20 ms
style.min.css
24 ms
frontend.css
695 ms
uaf.css
22 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
28 ms
post-2853.css
31 ms
post-4549.css
715 ms
jet-elements.css
43 ms
jet-elements-skin.css
38 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
50 ms
swiper.min.css
52 ms
post-7.css
57 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
60 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
64 ms
global.css
756 ms
post-25.css
76 ms
post-29.css
85 ms
post-285.css
99 ms
style.css
109 ms
fontawesome.min.css
119 ms
solid.min.css
131 ms
brands.min.css
137 ms
jquery.min.js
146 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
158 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
167 ms
widget-loop-builder.min.css
857 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
1387 ms
widget-theme-elements.min.css
1433 ms
email-decode.min.js
700 ms
post-1538.css
1430 ms
regular.min.css
714 ms
animations.min.css
1402 ms
rs6.css
1699 ms
frontend.min.js
862 ms
rbtools.min.js
864 ms
rs6.min.js
874 ms
filter-posts.js
880 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
884 ms
slick.min.js
891 ms
jet-plugins.js
892 ms
frontend.js
918 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1585 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
2080 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1369 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1375 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1411 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
2051 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2058 ms
hooks.min.js
1378 ms
i18n.min.js
1369 ms
frontend.min.js
1385 ms
waypoints.min.js
1375 ms
core.min.js
1367 ms
frontend.min.js
1371 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1369 ms
jet-elements.min.js
1368 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
858 ms
gtm.js
162 ms
fbevents.js
58 ms
sbi-sprite.png
1444 ms
VEmblem-White.png
851 ms
Hero-Slider-Image-4.png
2457 ms
background-1.png
2488 ms
deadlift-1.png
2900 ms
move-tile-scaled.jpg
2925 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk79FN_C-bw.ttf
1314 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk7PFN_C-bw.ttf
1340 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk6jFN_C-bw.ttf
1360 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59FN_C-bw.ttf
1382 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4jE9_C-bw.ttf
1386 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4aE9_C-bw.ttf
1399 ms
xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E9_C-bw.ttf
1406 ms
aciertext-solid.otf
2585 ms
js
76 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2666 ms
collect
38 ms
collect
22 ms
ga-audiences
32 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
3069 ms
move.svg
1882 ms
0E4A3005-2.png
3908 ms
high-performance.svg
2094 ms
DSC09718.png
4155 ms
sweat.svg
2880 ms
C0130.MP4.04_50_26_01.Still001.jpg
2233 ms
WEBSITE_COL_23-11-2-e1693906661439.jpg
3416 ms
Group-4213.svg
2982 ms
Group-4228.svg
3538 ms
Layer_1-2-1.png
3642 ms
bfba0eef5ce23975cda2fdc4de8f5f05.jpg
4767 ms
phone_mockup-1-1.png
5030 ms
Group-63.png
4417 ms
admin-ajax.php
3929 ms
revl.com.au accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
revl.com.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
revl.com.au SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Revl.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Revl.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
revl.com.au
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of REVL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: