Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 70

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

rf1000.de

RF1000.de - Portal

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

635 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

284 ms

rf1000.de screenshot

About Website

Visit rf1000.de now to see the best up-to-date RF1000 content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rf1000.de

Visit rf1000.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Rf1000.de page load time and found that the first response time was 635 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rf1000.de performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rf1000.de

635 ms

www.rf1000.de

2316 ms

stylesheet.css

206 ms

stylesheet.css

215 ms

blinknotify.css

215 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rf1000.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rf1000.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 200.1 kB (70%)

Content Size

287.0 kB

After Optimization

86.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Rf1000.de main page is 287.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 142.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 73.3 kB

  • Original 85.0 kB
  • After minification 78.7 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 59.9 kB
  • After minification 48.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RF1000 needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 115.6 kB

  • Original 142.1 kB
  • After minification 108.9 kB
  • After compression 26.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rf1000.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (70%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RF1000. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rf1000.de accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

rf1000.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rf1000.de SEO score

70

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rf1000.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rf1000.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RF1000. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: