2 sec in total
60 ms
1.7 sec
280 ms
Visit rfacsolutions.com now to see the best up-to-date RFAC Solutions content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rfacsolutions.com
Specializing in supplying premium RF connectors, components, and cables from South Korea, including: SMA, BNC, TNC, N-Type connectors, dust caps, & adapters.
Visit rfacsolutions.comWe analyzed Rfacsolutions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rfacsolutions.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value960 ms
29/100
30%
Value1.207
1/100
15%
Value12.7 s
14/100
10%
60 ms
718 ms
97 ms
151 ms
153 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rfacsolutions.com, 88% (77 requests) were made to Pnerfsolutions.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (718 ms) relates to the external source Pnerfsolutions.com.
Page size can be reduced by 94.6 kB (16%)
595.9 kB
501.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rfacsolutions.com main page is 595.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 255.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RFAC Solutions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 512 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rfacsolutions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (89%)
73
8
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RFAC Solutions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rfacsolutions.com
60 ms
718 ms
style-point-selection-block.css
97 ms
style.min.css
151 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
153 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
154 ms
css.min.css
155 ms
css.min.css
154 ms
photoswipe.min.css
156 ms
default-skin.min.css
198 ms
css.min.css
209 ms
css.min.css
253 ms
style.min.css
205 ms
siteorigin-corp-icons.min.css
208 ms
woocommerce.min.css
201 ms
css
42 ms
gpls_woo_rfq.css
248 ms
jquery.min.js
305 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
264 ms
underscore.min.js
263 ms
wp-util.min.js
264 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
297 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
337 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
302 ms
js.cookie.min.js
373 ms
woocommerce.min.js
303 ms
s-202437.js
21 ms
wc-blocks.css
332 ms
so-css-siteorigin-corp.css
333 ms
sow-hero-default-f78426722d0e-817.css
336 ms
slider.css
333 ms
sow-button-wire-064c1ba518fd.css
334 ms
style.css
333 ms
style.css
357 ms
style.css
365 ms
sow-headline-default-c3230bf77246-817.css
365 ms
sow-features-default-d3d64c7728e9-817.css
364 ms
style.css
366 ms
style.css
364 ms
e-202437.js
2 ms
sow-headline-default-32678db6fb78-817.css
403 ms
sow-headline-default-7ea90326d54c-817.css
367 ms
sow-image-default-c67d20f9f743-817.css
311 ms
sow-headline-default-0b9e28862a38-817.css
308 ms
sow-contact-form-default-f460b0c26922-817.css
306 ms
sow-image-default-8b5b6f678277-817.css
307 ms
front-legacy.css
345 ms
js.min.js
377 ms
js.min.js
336 ms
photoswipe.min.js
331 ms
photoswipe-ui-default.min.js
327 ms
js.min.js
325 ms
js.min.js
348 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
367 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
297 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
296 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
295 ms
jquery.theme.min.js
296 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.min.js
308 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
309 ms
order-attribution.min.js
273 ms
rfq_dummy.js
277 ms
gpls_woo_rfq.js
240 ms
styling.min.js
282 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
285 ms
jquery.slider.min.js
287 ms
sow.jquery.fittext.min.js
286 ms
jquery.cycle.swipe.min.js
286 ms
contact.min.js
286 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
30 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
34 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
34 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
35 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
38 ms
rfac-logo-long.png
374 ms
landisgyr-logo.png
354 ms
inova-logo.png
345 ms
drs-logo.png
346 ms
skyworks-logo.png
345 ms
typicons.woff
243 ms
feature-background.woff
225 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
278 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
229 ms
sat-tower.jpg
200 ms
ionicons.ttf
149 ms
slider.woff
50 ms
rfacsolutions.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
rfacsolutions.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rfacsolutions.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rfacsolutions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Rfacsolutions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rfacsolutions.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RFAC Solutions. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: